In 2013, Australia introduced a health star rating system to help people choose healthier food. The decision was a result of years of discussions between health experts and the food industry. Initially, it was optional, largely because food industry leaders influenced the makeup of the decision-makers.
Fast-forward more than a decade, and the health star rating is now becoming mandatory. This change reflects ongoing efforts by public health advocates who faced resistance from a powerful food industry. Despite the push for healthier choices, many health groups are concerned about the actual implementation of this system, as only 39% of food manufacturers have voluntarily adopted the label.
One issue is that food companies often reformulate their products to appear healthier. For instance, a sugary drink might show better health star ratings than plain milk thanks to added fiber. This tactic can mislead consumers instead of providing clear guidance.
Health experts argue that the current system doesn’t account for important factors. Ingredients like emulsifiers or artificial flavors, which can impact health, are ignored in the rating. Meanwhile, food companies may choose not to show their ratings altogether if the number is unfavorable.
Though many public health organizations welcome the move toward mandatory health stars, some suggest starting fresh with clearer labeling that warns about unhealthy foods instead of relying on a rating system that can be misleading.
There’s also a broader context to consider. Australia has some of the highest consumption rates of ultraprocessed foods, largely due to aggressive marketing and pricing strategies that favor unhealthy options. This makes it challenging for families trying to maintain a healthy diet, especially amid rising living costs. Studies show that healthier foods often cost more, making it difficult for many to make the right choices.
Moreover, public health experts emphasize that both regulation and corporate accountability are necessary to ensure healthier food environments. Consumer choice alone is not enough when structural issues impact what people can easily access. Without more transparency and regulation, unhealthy diets are likely to persist, leading to further health inequities.
This change in policy is a positive step, yet many challenges remain. Political will is crucial to ensure the health star rating system and other health initiatives lead to tangible changes in dietary habits across Australia.
Source link
