Congress MP Randeep Singh Surjewala has sharply criticized the Indian government for the recent India-US trade framework. He argues that this agreement puts Indian farmers, energy security, and digital privacy at risk. Surjewala challenges the government’s ‘Atmanirbhar Bharat’ (self-reliant India) narrative, suggesting that India might be leaning toward dependence on the U.S. rather than fostering self-reliance.
Surjewala claims that the Modi administration has compromised farmers’ interests by agreeing to lower tariffs. This, he believes, will allow American agricultural products and processed foods access to Indian markets, creating imbalanced competition for local producers. He warns that these actions could undermine domestic agriculture and diminish data privacy protections.
He also questions whether the Indian government is strong or failing. “Are we strengthening our economy, or are we becoming more dependent?” he asks. The implication is clear: this trade deal raises concerns about India’s autonomy.
The Congress leader expressed frustration with the government’s transparency, emphasizing his disappointment when the External Affairs Minister downplayed key aspects of the agreement. Surjewala’s stance is that this lack of clarity does not inspire public confidence in the government’s ability to manage trade effectively.
Surjewala highlights the potential dangers for farmers, alleging that the deal could make it easier for American products to enter the Indian market, disrupting local livelihoods. He referenced existing data, noting that $334 million worth of cotton imports has already pressured domestic prices downward. Surjewala questioned if other sectors, such as dairy or wheat, would also be subjected to zero-tariff concessions, which could further harm rural economies.
Recent studies show that farmers in India are concerned about competition with foreign products, with over 60% fearing price drops due to imports. This sentiment echoes in social media trends, where many express worries about the long-term impact on Indian agriculture.
The trade framework, which covers tariffs on select industrial and agricultural goods, is seen by Surjewala as detrimental to Indian interests. Instead of bolstering local producers, he believes it could weaken their position.
In summary, Surjewala’s critique highlights the complex dynamics of international trade and its potential impact on local economies. As the debate continues, many are keen to see how the government will address these concerns and provide clarity on its priorities.
For more detailed insights on India’s trade policies, check the Ministry of Commerce and Industry.
Source link
Congress attacks BJP, US India trade deal, Congress on India US Trade Deal
