This article originally appeared on Inside Climate News, covering climate, energy, and the environment.
By Bob Berwyn, Inside Climate News
Recent research highlights a troubling trend: some companies and nations are treating our atmosphere as a waste dump. This study looked into the fallout from a Falcon rocket that lost control and disintegrated on February 19, 2025. The rocket had launched several Starlink satellites earlier that month.
This research is notable because it is the first to track pollution particles from a specific rocket in the upper atmosphere. The study finds that these changes could affect the stratosphere, where vital climate processes occur. Until recently, this area had seen little human impact.
Lead author Robin Wing from the Leibniz Institute of Atmospheric Physics explained that images of the debris were captured across northern Europe, allowing for high-resolution observations. He noted this could help us track emissions from such incidents better.
The study points out a crucial need for monitoring spaceflight emissions. According to a 2024 UN University report, the rapid growth in commercial space flights is not matched by regulations. More satellite launches mean higher pollution risks unless we collaborate on global monitoring efforts.
Even historical agreements like the Outer Space Treaty stress avoiding harmful contamination from space objects. These agreements are vital as the pollution from rocket launches affects not only the countries that send rockets into space but also those that don’t participate in launches at all.
A 2025 NOAA study predicts emissions from disintegrated satellites will rise sharply as the number of satellites grows. By 2040, we could see as many as 60,000 satellites, releasing thousands of tons of aluminum oxide into the upper atmosphere each year. This could warm parts of the atmosphere by 1.5 degrees Celsius within a few years, disrupting winds and ozone layers.
Research from the 2025 European Geosciences Union conference revealed even more potential impacts. Atmospheric scientist Laura Revell indicated that increased rocket exhaust could hinder our progress in fighting ozone depletion. Projections suggest that with up to 2,000 launches each year, around 3% of ozone could be lost, a risk comparable to severe wildfire seasons.
Over the past five years, the mass of human-made debris in the upper atmosphere has doubled, with metals like lithium being more common than natural meteoric debris. Experts argue that we should treat orbital and near-space areas as part of the global environment, considering their growing importance.
College of Engineering researcher Moriba Jah has emphasized the need to recognize the environmental costs associated with our expanding access to space. He cautioned that if we don’t act soon, it may be too late to reverse the harmful effects of increasing emissions from commercial space activities.
Leonard Schulz from the Technical University Braunschweig warned us not to overlook these issues. He noted that if we continue to inject large amounts of metals into the atmosphere, the implications could be significant and far-reaching.
As we stand on the brink of a new era in space exploration, it’s crucial to approach these developments responsibly. Addressing potential pollution risks could ensure that our excursions into space don’t come at the expense of our home planet.
Source link
atmospheric aerosols,black carbon,Falcon rocket,geoengineering,greenhouse gas emissions,Outer Space Treaty and Liability Convention,ozone depletion,rocket fuels,rocket pollution,space flights,space industry,SpaceX,Starlink satellites,upper atmosphere
