LOS ANGELES (AP) — A 20-year-old woman, identified as KGM, took the witness stand to share her experiences growing up with social media. She spent countless hours on platforms like YouTube and Instagram, starting from age six and nine, respectively. KGM claims her early exposure led to a harmful addiction, worsening her depression and suicidal thoughts. This trial is critical; its outcome could influence numerous other lawsuits against social media companies.
A Complicated Childhood
Dressed in a pink floral dress, KGM felt nervous as she recounted her childhood in a quiet Chico, California cul-de-sac. She shared happy memories, like themed birthday parties and trips to Six Flags. However, her relationship with her mother was strained, often revolving around conflicts over her phone use.
Testimony from both sides highlighted KGM’s challenging home life. Her attorneys argue that social media companies exploited her vulnerabilities. On the flip side, lawyers for Meta and YouTube claimed she turned to social media as an escape from her struggles.
While KGM conceded that her mom might not have been perfect, she thought her mother was trying her best. Yet, during cross-examination, she acknowledged that there were times of physical and emotional abuse, particularly when she was in sixth grade and struggling with self-harm.
The Allure of Notifications
KGM described how the instant gratification of notifications on Instagram and YouTube gave her a “rush.” She would even sneak away during school to check her accounts. Despite using the platforms less now, she admitted it was hard to set limits on her time spent online.
Filters on Instagram, which altered her appearance, were addictive. She recalled how nearly every photo she posted featured a filter, showing her obsession with seemingly perfect looks. This obsession is troubling; studies indicate that social media use can worsen body image issues, especially among young people.
Meta’s Defense and Contradictions
In its defense, Meta pointed out KGM’s pre-existing challenges. The company’s lawyer, Paul Schmidt, raised important questions about whether social media was a significant factor in her mental health decline. During cross-examination, Meta’s attorney emphasized inconsistencies between KGM’s current testimony and her past statements, suggesting she faced many pressures unrelated to social media.
KGM, however, maintained that she hadn’t sought help for what she viewed as a social media addiction because she didn’t want advice to quit altogether.
Insights from Mental Health Experts
Victoria Burke, a therapist who worked with KGM, testified that social media and KGM’s identity were deeply intertwined. Burke noted that interactions on these platforms could significantly influence KGM’s mood. Research supports this; a 2021 survey found that 60% of teens felt social media affected their self-esteem.
The trial will continue, affecting the landscape of similar lawsuits against social media firms. As society grapples with this digital age, discussions around mental health and social media remain crucial, as experts warn about the deep connections between online interactions and real-life implications.
The outcome could set significant precedents, particularly as Meta faces other legal challenges, including a distinct trial in New Mexico.
For more insights on the impact of social media on mental health, visit the American Psychological Association.
Source link
General news, Addiction and treatment, Social media, California, Technology, Business, Depression, U.S. news, Paul Schmidt, Alphabet, Inc., World news, Phyllis Jones, Trials, Mental health, Mark Lanier, Juries, Victoria Burke, U.S. News, World News
