LAS VEGAS (AP) — A significant change could be on the horizon for gun shipping in the U.S. For the first time in almost a century, the U.S. Postal Service (USPS) might allow the mailing of handguns if a new rule is approved. This proposal, backed by the Trump administration, has drawn strong opposition from Democratic attorneys general across twenty-four states.
Historically, in 1927, Congress banned mailing concealable firearms through USPS to tackle crime. This decision aimed to protect communities by limiting access to handguns. Recently, however, the Department of Justice revisited that law. They argued that it goes against the Second Amendment, which protects the right to bear arms. Their stance encourages USPS to change its regulations.
The Department of Justice stated, “as long as Congress operates a parcel service, the Second Amendment prevents it from refusing shipment of firearms to law-abiding citizens.” Under the proposed rules, everyone would be allowed to mail concealable firearms, with restrictions similar to those that apply to mailing long guns.
Nevada Attorney General Aaron Ford criticized the rule change, emphasizing that it undermines efforts to reduce gun violence in states like Nevada, which is still healing after the devastating 2017 mass shooting in Las Vegas that left 60 people dead. Following that tragedy, Nevada enacted laws requiring background checks for most private gun sales, a move aimed at increasing safety.
Ford expressed concern, stating, “To suggest we make it easier for criminals and abusers to access firearms is a slap in the face to gun violence survivors and law enforcement.” His statement reflects a broader sentiment among state officials who fear increased risks associated with the proposed changes.
If the new rules go into effect, individuals could send firearms within state lines. However, mailing guns across state lines would involve stricter regulations. For instance, a person could only send a gun to themselves via another person, aligning it with lawful activities like hunting and target practice.
The Justice Department argues that existing state laws create hurdles for lawful gun transportation, inhibiting personal freedom for activities such as self-defense. This rationale suggests that mailing firearms might be the only feasible option for many gun owners when traveling.
With over two dozen attorneys general opposing the changes, concerns center around the potential for easier access to guns for those legally prohibited from ownership, such as convicted felons. They believe this rule could complicate efforts to address gun crimes. Many state laws include safety courses and background checks, which could be bypassed if USPS changes regulations.
Law enforcement groups express alarm about the burden of tracking firearms shipped through USPS, warning that it may strain state resources. In contrast, private shipping companies like UPS and FedEx maintain strict guidelines, only allowing shipments for customers with appropriate federal licenses.
Mixed reactions are surfacing. Gun advocacy groups celebrate the proposed change, viewing it as a win for responsible gun owners. John Commerford from the National Rifle Association heralded it as progress, aligning handgun shipping with other firearm regulations.
Conversely, gun safety organizations worry that this rule could facilitate gun trafficking, adversely affecting public safety. John Feinblatt, from Everytown for Gun Safety, voiced concerns that the USPS could become a conduit for illegal firearms, weakening law enforcement’s ability to combat gun violence.
As discussions continue, the fate of this rule remains uncertain. The public has taken note, showcasing how engaged citizens and officials share differing perspectives on gun ownership and community safety through social media.
For more insights, you can check out the AP News.
Source link
Congress,Las Vegas,Attorney General,Second Amendment,Mandalay Bay,John Commerford
