Recently, San Diego’s Democratic congressional representatives have raised concerns about executive orders that might negatively impact local scientists. This follows the Trump administration’s proposal to freeze federal funding and restrict certain research-related language.
Representatives Scott Peters, Sara Jacobs, Mike Levin, and Juan Vargas sent a letter urging the reinstatement of funding cuts that will affect the National Institutes of Health (NIH).
This issue is significant because the proposed funding cuts could deprive California researchers of $800 million. Peters and his colleagues hope to pressure the NIH into reconsidering these cuts.
It’s uncertain whether their efforts will make a difference. Peters acknowledged that at least their opposition is on record. However, some local scientists are questioning if lawmakers are truly committed to protecting their funding. “We do have some influence, but the ultimate decision lies with the president,” Peters explained.
Peters pointed out the challenge they face: “The reality is, Donald Trump was elected as president, along with a Congress that largely supports him. We’re in a tough spot.”
In numbers, Peters’ district receives $1 billion in NIH funding each year, more than any other district in California. This area is home to leading research institutions like UC San Diego, Scripps Research, the Salk Institute, and La Jolla Immunology. Their work includes breakthroughs in cancer treatment, drug discovery, and vaccines.
Looking forward, Peters has some hope that the courts will intervene against the funding cuts. A federal judge has already delayed NIH cuts, labeling them as unlawful.
