Illinois Lawmakers Unite to Propose Ban on Dangerous Food Additives for Healthier Eating

Illinois lawmakers are considering a bill that would ban certain food additives linked to health issues like cancer and behavioral problems in children. The proposed law focuses on four specific additives: erythrosine (red dye No. 3), brominated vegetable oil, potassium bromate, and propylparaben.

These additives are often found in popular snacks such as cookies, candies, and bread. Research, including studies from the California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, suggests that these ingredients may contribute to cognitive health risks in children and animals. For instance, consuming foods with these additives has been linked to increased hyperactivity in children.

State Senator Willie Preston, a Democrat from Chicago, has been advocating for this bill since last session. He was inspired after visiting Israel, where regulations on food additives are much stricter. In that country, food products undergo extensive testing before they’re approved for sale.

“I noticed a difference in how the food affected me, which made me concerned about what my kids were eating,” Preston shared. He believes it’s essential for Illinois to take similar action to protect its residents from harmful ingredients. “We must ensure our foods are safe and healthy,” he emphasized.

However, not everyone agrees that a ban is necessary. Dr. Mike Endris, a pediatrician at OSF Healthcare in Peoria, acknowledges that while some additives could be harmful, pinpointing them as the primary cause of health problems is tricky. He mentioned that red dye No. 3 has been associated with worsened ADHD symptoms in children who consume it frequently. Yet, Endris pointed out that the scientific understanding of food additives is still evolving, and more research is needed to fully understand their long-term effects.

“If evidence shows these additives are harmful, then there should be a nationwide ban,” Endris stated, underscoring the importance of having consistent regulations across the country.

On the other hand, Senator Li Arellano, a Republican from Dixon, opposed the bill. He argues that regulating food additives should fall under federal jurisdiction, specifically the FDA. “A single national process is the best way to ensure safety,” Arellano said, cautioning against creating a complicated patchwork of state laws that could burden food manufacturers.

Donovan Griffith, from the Illinois Manufacturers’ Association, expressed similar views. He recognizes public health concerns but believes that the FDA is better equipped to handle regulations concerning food additives. Griffith warned that differing state regulations would complicate manufacturing and compliance for national brands.

Interestingly, the FDA is already moving to ban red dye No. 3 and brominated vegetable oil—two of the additives mentioned in Preston’s bill. Preston reassures that he has engaged with food manufacturers to address concerns about supply chain disruptions, citing California’s existing ban on these substances as a precedent.

“The health of the people in Illinois should come first,” Preston asserted. He highlighted the increasing healthcare costs tied to illnesses potentially linked to these additives. The bill has passed through committee and is now set for a vote on the Senate floor.

Source link

health risk,propylparaben.,candy,Sen. Li Arellano,illinois,state house,house,ban,research,state congress