Scotland’s Climate Crisis: How £45 Billion in Annual Costs Could Impact Our Future

The upcoming report titled Into The Red, published by the Royal Scottish Geographical Society (RSGS), sheds light on Scotland’s changing stance on climate goals. This report arrives just one year after the Scottish Government abandoned its target for 2030.

Mike Robinson, CEO of RSGS, critiques the government for reversing its commitments toward climate action. He emphasizes that there is no room for delay: "We know we need to act on climate change—ignoring this is misleading." He calls for immediate leadership and investment to safeguard communities.

Co-authored by Dr. Richard Dixon, the report brings together various economic analyses. For instance, the 2006 Stern Review suggested that inaction on climate change could shave 5-20% off global GDP. A 2022 Oxford Economics report echoed these concerns, projecting a 20% impact by 2050. Dr. Dixon notes, “It’s the first time these figures for Scotland have been compiled. The projected upper costs are startling."

Recent statements from Allianz, a leading insurance firm, indicate that climate change could threaten capitalism itself. Robinson highlights potential costs of inaction, estimating between £3 billion and £14 billion annually by 2050, possibly escalating to about £15 to £45 billion afterward. He warns, "Investing in carbon-heavy projects, like new roads or gas plants, increases our economic risks."

Flooding, wildfires, and other extreme weather events are already costing Scotland dearly. Current flooding costs are approximately £183 million per year, with projections suggesting that could rise to as much as £819 million by the 2080s. The Scottish Environment Protection Agency reports around 284,000 properties are at risk from flooding, a figure anticipated to climb by 40% in the coming decades.

Wildfire damage is likely to become a major concern as well. Currently estimated at around £300 million in the Highlands, this figure could rise to roughly £1.2 billion by the 2050s. Dr. Dixon highlights that previous wildfires have shown the extensive impact, covering productivity losses and infrastructure issues.

Interestingly, while the Highland region’s GDP could shrink due to climate impacts—by about 1.5% per year by the 2050s—estimates about the cost of transitioning to net-zero emissions vary between £1.2 billion and £5 billion annually by 2030.

The report calls for a minimum of 5% of public spending to be directed toward positive climate action, which translates to an annual investment of £7 billion to £11 billion. Spending a fraction by 2030 on climate initiatives is deemed prudent compared to the future costs of inaction.

The report also pinpoints how climate change disproportionately affects vulnerable populations, including lower-income households and minority communities. Dr. Dixon notes, "Those less financially secure often live in flood-risk zones and are less likely to have adequate insurance."

Although the report identifies significant economic threats, it acknowledges that Scotland may not face the worst of climate change’s impact as some other regions do. Nevertheless, costs could be underestimated. As Dr. Dixon mentions, these calculations do not consider potential "tipping points" in climate systems that could lead to steeper and more abrupt consequences.

In summary, Scotland stands at a crossroads in its climate strategy. With plans needing revision ahead of the next election, clarity on climate action remains elusive. In light of this, the RSGS calls on the government to establish a Climate Wealth Fund, ensuring that future public spending is environmentally positive.

Acting Minister for Climate Action Alasdair Allan recognizes the urgency of these findings, stating that Scotland is advancing toward net zero and remains a front-runner in the UK regarding emissions reductions. He affirms the government’s commitment to addressing the climate crisis effectively and fairly.

For more information and expert insights on climate change and its potential economic impact, check out The Guardian’s analysis.

Check out this related article: Building Stronger Cities: A Deep Dive into Urban Resilience and Sustainable Solutions