Australia has set a groundbreaking precedent by becoming the first country to ban social media for children under 16. Effective December 10, platforms like TikTok, YouTube, Instagram, and Facebook will be off-limits to this age group. The law requires major platforms to block access to young users or face hefty fines of up to A$49.5 million (about $33 million).
This move has drawn mixed reactions. Parents and child advocates largely support it, viewing it as a step toward protecting children from online dangers. In contrast, tech companies and free speech advocates express concerns over potential overreach and the implications for youth engagement online.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese hailed the law as a victory for families. He emphasized the need for humans to control technology, especially when it comes to the safety of children online. He urged young people to explore new hobbies instead of spending time on social media.
In recent years, discussions around kids’ online safety have intensified. A study showed that 86% of Australian kids aged 8 to 15 pop into social media regularly. This highlights how embedded these platforms are in daily life. Yet, the government asserts that protecting children takes priority, especially with rising concerns about mental health linked to online use.
Youth reactions to the ban reflect a mix of understanding and apprehension. Some teens, like 14-year-old Annie Wang, worry that restricting access will worsen mental health issues, particularly for those seeking community or support. Many young users view social media as a vital tool for connection, especially for marginalized groups.
Internationally, countries including Denmark, New Zealand, and Malaysia are closely watching Australia’s experiment. They may consider adopting similar legislation, indicating a possible shift in how countries approach youth engagement online.
Elon Musk’s platform, X, was the last to agree to comply with the new law, stating that it must follow the legal requirements set by Australia. The implementation of these age restrictions poses new challenges for social media companies, which typically rely on a young audience for growth.
As this law unfolds, many eyes will remain on Australia to see how effective it truly is in keeping children safe without stifling their freedom and capacity for connection online.
Source link
NRLPA:ODAT,RULES:WORLD-AUSTRALIA,TOPNWS,CCOS,CMPNY,CYCS,DLI,ENT,GEN,LIF,MDIA,MOBAPP,NETSV,NEWPUB,NEWS1,PUB,PUBL,READ,REGS,SMED,SOCI,SOCMED,SOFW,SRCHEN,SWIT,TECH,TMT,TOPCMB,WWW,AMERS,US,AU,ASEAN,MY,NAMER,SEASIA,ASXPAC,EMRG,AUNZ,ASIA,DEST:AUF,DEST:CSA,DEST:LBY,DEST:REULB,DEST:ABX,DEST:G,DEST:RAST,DEST:PGE,DEST:RNP,DEST:E,DEST:PCU,DEST:ABN,DEST:AFA,DEST:BNX,DEST:PSC,DEST:U,DEST:DNP,DEST:FUN,DEST:UCDPTEST,DEST:RWSA,DEST:GNS,DEST:RWS,DEST:PCO,DEST:RBN,NRLPA:OPUB,LEGAL,REUTERS-LEGAL,DEST:OUSTCM,DEST:OUSWDM,DEST:ODAT,DEST:OPUB,PACKAGE:WORLD-NEWS,DEST:LITA,DEST:OUSBSM,DEST:OCABSM,MTVID,MTPIX,PXP,DEST:OUSTPM,DEST:OCATPM,PACKAGE:US-TOP-NEWS,CHLD
