A federal judge has ruled that The New York Times and several other newspapers can continue their copyright lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft. The case revolves around the use of journalists’ work to train AI chatbots.
In a recent decision, U.S. District Judge Sidney Stein of New York dismissed a few claims but allowed most of the case to move forward. This decision opens the door for a potential jury trial. Ian Crosby, an attorney for The Times, expressed satisfaction with the ruling, emphasizing that their copyright claims against Microsoft and OpenAI for allegedly using their work without permission will continue.
Frank Pine, executive editor of MediaNews Group, also voiced support for the decision. He noted that dismissing some claims does not weaken their main argument: that these companies have infringed on their rights, harming their business.
OpenAI responded positively to the ruling, highlighting the dismissal of various claims. They assert that they build their AI models using publicly available data in a fair manner that encourages innovation. Microsoft chose not to comment on the matter.
The New York Times has raised serious concerns, claiming that OpenAI and Microsoft threaten their business model by allegedly using billions of dollars of the paper’s content without compensation. Reportedly, some AI responses include text pulled directly from The Times.
This controversy sheds light on the ongoing tensions between traditional media and tech companies. As AI continues to evolve, the way it interacts with copyrighted material could significantly impact the future of journalism.
Interestingly, the conversation around AI and copyright is gaining momentum. According to a recent survey by the Pew Research Center, 60% of Americans express concern over how AI is changing the media landscape. These sentiments reflect a broader worry about the potential loss of quality journalism in favor of algorithm-generated content.
The Associated Press has taken a different route by entering a licensing agreement with OpenAI, granting access to certain parts of their archives. This partnership highlights a possible way forward for media organizations to collaborate with tech firms while still protecting their content.
As the case unfolds, it will be intriguing to see how it shapes the future of both journalism and artificial intelligence.
Check out this related article: NFL Competition Committee Suggests Exciting Changes: Touchbacks to 35-Yard Line and Permanent Dynamic Kickoff
Source linkSidney Stein, Generative AI, Intellectual property, Artificial intelligence, Lawsuits, Legal proceedings, Manhattan, WA State Wire, New York City Wire, CA State Wire, Courts, Technology, Associated Press, Theft, Business, Frank Pine, Ian Crosby
