Elizabeth G. Oyer, the Justice Department’s pardon attorney, was let go after she declined to recommend that actor Mel Gibson, a supporter of President Trump, have his gun rights restored. This decision was linked to Gibson’s conviction for misdemeanor domestic violence in 2011. Oyer raised concerns that this situation threatened public safety and the Department’s credibility.
In an interview, Oyer labeled the request for Gibson’s inclusion in a memo about restoring gun rights as a dangerous move, emphasizing that it was not a matter of political bias but one of safety. She shared that she was once part of a team tasked with reviewing gun rights restoration for individuals with criminal records and that domestic violence cases, in particular, posed significant risks.
Oyer noted that restoring gun rights to those with a history of domestic violence should be carefully evaluated. While some advocates argue for restoring rights to nonviolent offenders, laws historically prevent those convicted of crimes, including domestic violence, from owning firearms.
Initially, Oyer and her team identified 95 individuals they felt qualified for a review to regain their gun rights. However, when asked to include Gibson after a letter from his attorney highlighted his high-profile status and relationship with the president, Oyer hesitated. She expressed that her selection process involved thorough background checks, while she lacked the same level of insight into Gibson’s case.
Gibson had pleaded no contest to domestic violence charges, receiving probation, community service, and counseling without jail time. He had attempted to buy a gun recently but was denied due to his conviction. Oyer’s evaluation took into account the potential consequences of allowing someone with a history of domestic violence to possess firearms.
After refusing to support the recommendation, Oyer was confronted by Justice Department officials who implied that Gibson’s relationship with Trump should influence her decision. Resisting the pressure, she remained firm in her stance. Eventually, Oyer was called back to her office and informed of her termination, leaving her in disbelief.
Oyer criticized the process for potentially overlooking the detailed evaluations customarily conducted by the Justice Department. She found the push for a more automated system alarming, fearing it could compromise thorough case assessments.
Despite the efforts to expedite gun rights restoration for certain individuals, Oyer believed that the complexities surrounding domestic violence cases needed careful consideration. In the wake of her dismissal, the broader implications of such decisions on public safety continue to be a matter of concern.
Check out this related article: Elon Musk Alleges ‘Massive Cyberattack’ on X: What You Need to Know – DW, 03/11/2025
Source linkTrump, Donald J,Musk, Elon,Internal Revenue Service,Layoffs and Job Reductions,Executive Orders and Memorandums,Treasury Department,Europe,Customs (Tariff)
