Breaking News: N.C. Supreme Court Pauses Vote Verification for 65,000 Ballots in Crucial Judicial Race

On Monday, the North Carolina Supreme Court paused a lower court ruling that mandated a recount of over 65,000 votes from the tightly contested 2024 state Supreme Court race. This decision gives the court time to review an appeal from Democratic candidate Allison Riggs.

Riggs had a narrow lead over Republican candidate Jefferson Griffin after the election in November, which sparked a series of recounts. Official counts showed Riggs ahead by 734 votes, out of more than 5.5 million ballots cast. However, the race remains uncalled by NBC News’ Decision Desk.

Following the recounts, Griffin’s campaign raised legal challenges, claiming that over 65,000 votes were cast illegally. Their allegations revolved around voters lacking proper identification and overseas voters who hadn’t resided in North Carolina.

Riggs’ spokesperson, Sophie Mestas, expressed relief at the Supreme Court’s decision, emphasizing the importance of protecting eligible voters. “We’re pleased the court halted this misinformed order and will keep fighting for voter rights,” she stated.

Conversely, Griffin’s spokesperson, Paul Shumaker, remarked that the ruling was anticipated and part of the ongoing legal process. This complex situation has been bouncing between federal and state courts for several months, with the state court now at the center of the decision.

The recent ruling temporarily blocks a Friday decision from the North Carolina Court of Appeals. That ruling required the State Board of Elections to verify the identity of challenged voters. Those who don’t respond risk having their votes invalidated.

This case highlights broader issues about voting rights and election integrity in North Carolina, where debates over voter ID laws have been contentious. Research indicates that such laws, often framed as measures to prevent fraud, can disproportionately affect marginalized communities. A study by the Brennan Center for Justice found that stricter ID requirements can lead to thousands of eligible voters being disenfranchised.

With a 5-2 Republican majority on the North Carolina Supreme Court, the stakes are high. Riggs has recused herself from the case, while Griffin also stepped back as a judge in this contentious legal battle.

As the situation unfolds, it’s clear that even small changes in counts can significantly impact the outcome. The intricate dance of the legal process continues, reflecting the persistent struggle over voting rights in America.

Check out this related article: Conservative Coalition Funded by Koch and Leo Takes Legal Action Against Trump’s Tariffs