Brown University Negotiates with Trump Administration to Secure $50 Million in Funding Restoration

Brown University recently struck a deal with the Trump administration to regain nearly $50 million in research funding. This agreement will also halt several federal investigations into the university. Christina Paxson, the university president, shared this news in an email to the campus community.

This resolution comes after the administration threatened to cut $510 million in federal support in April. Surprisingly, Brown is not alone; it’s the third Ivy League school to settle with the federal government this month.

As part of the agreement, Brown must ensure that there’s no discrimination in admissions and campus activities. The university will also provide federal officials with access to its admissions data. This move ends ongoing investigations led by various government departments.

Brown’s settlement is unique compared to others, like Columbia University, which agreed to pay a hefty $200 million but did not admit any wrongdoing. The university emphasized that the government cannot dictate how academic activities are conducted.

Education Secretary Linda McMahon previously called the Columbia settlement a “roadmap” for future changes in higher education, suggesting it could significantly affect campus culture.

In another key aspect of the deal, Brown pledged to abide by the Trump administration’s definitions of male and female for women’s athletics and other campus services. It also prohibits the university from offering gender-affirming surgeries to minors or prescribing puberty blockers.

Recent statistics indicate that about 25% of U.S. universities are currently reviewing their policies around gender identity in light of similar regulations. Experts suggest that institutions must navigate these changes carefully to balance educational integrity with compliance.

This agreement reflects broader trends in educational policy, pushing many universities to reconsider their practices. As social media discussions around campus policy continue to grow, reactions vary widely. Some applaud the move as a necessary enforcement of legal standards, while others criticize it as an infringement on academic freedom.

For more context, you can read about how other universities are adapting to these changes.

Source link