BRUNMAN: Calling on the Board of Visitors to Rekindle Your Humanity

Over a month has passed since University President Jim Ryan announced his resignation. This decision came amid federal threats and criticism from certain alumni. Many of us in the University community feel a mix of anger and disappointment—not just over the situation but for the loss of a leader who truly connected with students.

Ryan approached his role differently from many presidents at other institutions. While leaders at schools like Yale and Princeton often seem distant, he made an effort to engage with us. From his “Runs With Jim” events to teaching a class, he was active and present. The community response to his resignation, like the “Run For Jim,” showed how much he meant to us.

But it wasn’t just his visibility; it was his humanity. Ryan shared personal stories, like meeting his biological mother, and opened his home to students during difficult times. He showed genuine emotion, celebrating our successes and grieving our losses. When it came time for him to choose between his job and the well-being of the University, he stepped aside for our sake. His leadership felt personal, and his departure leaves a significant void.

In the wake of his resignation, the Board of Visitors’ response has been frustrating. Three days after Ryan announced his intentions, they promised to keep the community informed and engaged. However, since then, silence has prevailed. Faculty concerns and student outreach have gone unanswered, and even a letter from 12 deans received no acknowledgement. This lack of communication raises serious doubts about the Board’s commitment to transparency.

Looking ahead, there are concerns about the search for a new president. The current committee, chaired by Rector Rachel Sheridan, has only one student representative. This ignores a call for broader student involvement, which is crucial for ensuring that the next leader shares Ryan’s empathetic approach. If only a handful of Board members make decisions, it’s unlikely our next president will understand or prioritize student needs.

History shows us that moments like this can shape a university’s future. Similar leadership crises have often resulted in a disconnect between administration and students. The absence of student voices in the search committee could lead us down that path again.

Ultimately, the Board has the power to change course. They can listen and act on the concerns of students and stakeholders. However, it appears they remain indifferent, ignoring the calls for compassionate leadership in favor of maintaining the status quo.

We’re left yearning for a leader who embodies the humanity and engagement that Ryan brought to the role. In moments of crisis, the most effective leaders are those who listen and advocate for their communities. We hope to see that commitment moving forward, lest we surrender our needs and aspirations to insular decision-making.

For more insights on leadership in educational settings, you can explore resources from reputable outlets like the American Council on Education.

Wylie Brunman is an opinion editor who writes about politics for The Cavalier Daily. He can be reached at opinion@cavalierdaily.com. The views expressed here are solely those of the author.



Source link