California officials and researchers are raising concerns about plans to dismantle a key institution for weather and climate science: the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) in Colorado. This move, part of the Trump administration’s agenda, is seen as a threat not just to jobs, but to public safety and scientific progress.
Russell Vought, the former director of the Office of Management and Budget, claimed on X that the National Science Foundation intends to “break up” NCAR, labeling it a source of “climate alarmism.” This statement has stirred significant alarm among scientists and state officials who argue that the cuts will hinder crucial research that helps predict and respond to extreme weather events.
California’s Natural Resources Secretary Wade Crowfoot expressed his concern, emphasizing the connection between attacks on science and the safety of citizens. State climatologist Michael Anderson pointed out that NCAR has collaborated with California agencies to improve weather predictions, particularly for precipitation and snowpack. Losing this research hub, he stated, would set the nation back in responding to natural disasters like floods and wildfires.
Jennifer Balch, a fire scientist at the University of Colorado Boulder, warned that dismantling NCAR could lead to increased risks from wildfires. As research becomes limited, understanding the link between rising temperatures and fire frequency becomes challenging. Balch noted that this undermines not only public safety but also the scientific community itself.
Craig Clements, a meteorology expert at San José State University, added that shutting down NCAR would deprive the next generation of scientists of essential training and hands-on experience. “This is going to devastate atmospheric science research globally,” he said. Many educational opportunities rely on the resources and expertise that NCAR provides.
The implications of these cuts extend beyond California. Federal officials have noted that losing such a critical research facility would weaken weather forecasting capabilities across the United States. This comes at a time when extreme weather events seem to be increasing in both frequency and intensity.
According to a recent report from NASA, the frequency of severe weather disasters in the U.S. has increased by 49% in the past 50 years. As climate change continues to pose risks, the loss of research institutions like NCAR could hinder efforts to mitigate these threats effectively.
The implications are serious. As experts warn, the loss of crucial data, tools, and expertise will likely lead to further scrambling by universities and agencies to fill the gaps left behind, especially during peak storm seasons. With increased weather extremes affecting everyone, the need for robust climate science has never been more urgent.
As discussions about budget cuts continue, it’s vital to acknowledge the potential consequences. Maintaining strong support for scientific research is crucial for preparing for and responding to the challenges ahead.
This article draws on insights from various experts in climate research and emphasizes the importance of informed decision-making in matters concerning public safety and environmental science.
Source link
Donald Trump,wildfires
