Coalition’s Shocking 1/100 Score on Environmental and Climate Policies: What It Means for the Upcoming Federal Election

The Coalition’s environmental policies have drawn heavy criticism, receiving a dismal score of just 1 out of 100 from the Australian Conservation Foundation (ACF). This marks the lowest rating for the Liberal and National parties in over 20 years of evaluations. In contrast, Labor scored 54%, while the Greens excelled with an impressive 98%.

The ACF’s assessment analyzed responses from parties and independent candidates regarding their commitments to protecting biodiversity, advancing renewable energy, opposing nuclear energy, and taking strong action against climate change. The scorecard also took into account public policies, voting records, and statements.

Kelly O’Shanassy, CEO of the ACF, voiced serious concern over the Coalition’s apparent neglect of crucial environmental actions. She stated, “The Coalition’s low score reflects its reliance on harmful policies like gas and nuclear energy instead of supporting clean renewables.” O’Shanassy emphasized how these choices have made Australia more vulnerable to climate impact, citing devastating bushfires and floods that have destroyed homes and worsened insurance issues for families.

Interestingly, this low score isn’t new for the Coalition. In previous elections, their scores have consistently lagged behind Labor and the Greens. For example, in 2019 they scored 4 out of 100 compared to Labor’s 56 and the Greens’ 99.

Despite significant climate challenges, O’Shanassy noted that the two major parties have hardly addressed these pressing issues during this election cycle. Labor has shown some commitment to a cleaner energy future but still supports the coal and gas industries, which undermines its progress. Meanwhile, the Greens have a clear plan to enhance funding for nature and reform national protection laws.

The ACF has high hopes for independent candidates, who tended to score well on their scorecard. For instance, Nicolette Boele, running for the House of Representatives, achieved an average score of 91%. Other independents like Zoe Daniel and Zali Steggall also ranked highly.

As Australians prepare for the next federal election on May 3, 2025, with early voting starting on April 22, the ACF is encouraging voters to reflect on the importance of climate issues in their decision-making. They even offer a quiz to help voters find out which party aligns with their environmental values.

In a time when climate action is more pressing than ever, it’s crucial for voters to consider the environmental commitments of their chosen representatives. With the stakes higher than ever, every vote can impact the future of Australia’s climate and biodiversity.

For more insights on environmental policies and ratings, you can check the ACF’s scorecard here.

Check out this related article: “Brace for Impact: Trump’s Possible Executive Orders Against Environmental Nonprofits This Earth Day” – Inside Climate News

Source link

Australian Conservation Foundation,australian federal election 2025,Climate crisis,climate justice,environmental justice,Independent MPs,labor,liberal,political accountability,The Greens