Congress Critiques Environment Minister for Inability to Address Key Nicobar Project Questions

Concerns are rising about the Great Nicobar infrastructure project and its potential impact on local tribes and the environment. Ramesh, a Congress leader, pointed out that the Tribal Council’s worries are being overlooked, especially regarding the Shompen Policy, which prioritizes the community’s needs in any development. He questioned why the “Social Impact Assessment” didn’t include considerations for the Shompen and Nicobarese people.

The Forest Rights Act of 2006 designates the Shompen as the key authority for their tribal reserve. Yet, this seems to be ignored during the project’s approval process. Ramesh highlighted that the island is home to endangered species like leatherback turtles and saltwater crocodiles and argued that this project could push them closer to extinction. He also asked why crucial documents about the project remain unpublished, raising transparency concerns.

Given Great Nicobar’s history of severe subsidence during the 2004 tsunami, questions about the project’s sustainability arise. Will it withstand natural disasters, especially in a highly seismic area? Ramesh referenced a book from over twenty years ago, “Supreme Court on Forest Conservation,” to underline ongoing environmental activism. He lamented the challenges faced by environmental advocates, questioning when awareness would truly kick in.

Responding to criticism, Bhupender Yadav defended the project, calling it vital for national security and connectivity in the Indian Ocean Region. He stated that only 1.78% of Great Nicobar’s forest area would be affected. However, this reassurance did not quell the concerns voiced by others, including Sonia Gandhi, who labeled the project a “planned misadventure.” She warned that the project’s impact could threaten the very existence of the Shompen and Nicobarese tribes and disrupt one of the world’s unique ecosystems.

Gandhi also noted that the Nicobarese had been displaced during the 2004 tsunami, and this project could further hinder their return to ancestral lands. The influx of people and tourism could impose additional threats on the Shompen community. In a counter-argument, Yadav recently emphasized the project’s goal to establish Great Nicobar as a hub for maritime and air connectivity, featuring an international container terminal and a new airport.

This situation reflects a much larger trend in environmental and social governance. Surveys show that over 70% of people believe community rights should come first in development projects. As the conversation evolves, it is clear that balancing development with Indigenous rights and environmental protection is essential for genuine progress.

In summary, the debate around the Great Nicobar project highlights the critical intersection of community rights, environmental protection, and national interests. It’s a conversation that requires careful consideration of all stakeholders involved.

Source link

Congress,Environment Minister Bhupender Yadav,Great Nicobar infrastructure project