The recent UN climate summit in Belém, Brazil, ended with mixed results. While there was progress on funding for vulnerable nations, crucial discussions about reducing fossil fuel use stalled, raising concerns among climate advocates.
The summit concluded with a commitment to mobilize $1.3 trillion annually for global climate action by 2035. This includes plans to double adaptation funding for at-risk countries by 2025 and triple it by 2035. However, despite support from over 80 countries for a fossil fuel phase-out roadmap, the final agreement fell back on earlier terms that didn’t provide concrete timelines for reducing fossil fuel reliance.
Brazilian scientist Carlos Nobre highlighted the urgency, stating that to prevent severe warming—up to 2.5 degrees Celsius—fossil fuel use must be reduced to zero by 2040 to 2045. Exceeding this could lead to dire consequences, including coral reef loss and deforestation in the Amazon.
Current climate policies still point to a potential rise of 2.8 degrees Celsius, far above the targets set in the Paris Agreement. The UN Environment Programme’s Emissions Gap Report 2025 revealed that emissions must drop by 35% by 2035 from 2019 levels to stay on track for limiting global warming.
Adaptation was a hot topic at the summit, with vulnerable countries needing up to $365 billion annually by 2035. In contrast, public funding for adaptation was just $26 billion in 2023. Ghiwa Nakat from Greenpeace expressed concern over the adequacy of these funds, emphasizing the need for reliable grants rather than loans to effectively strengthen local resources.
Despite these challenges, climate finance is increasing globally, reaching $1.9 trillion in 2023, more than double the amount from 2020. Emerging markets are stepping up in climate investment, but disparities remain, as developing economies face fiscal pressures that slow their growth in climate adaptation.
The discussions at the summit underscored the ongoing disconnect between funding efforts and fossil fuel reduction, highlighting the work still needed to meet global climate goals. Engaging local communities and ensuring equitable access to adaptation funds will be critical moving forward.
For more information, you can refer to SciDev.Net.


















