How easy is it to whip up a healthy dinner for just $3? Recent U.S. dietary guidelines have sparked this conversation. Food economist William Masters engaged his colleagues in a fun exercise to explore how budget-friendly and healthy meals can be under these new rules.
Affordability is a hot topic, especially as politicians debate the rising cost of living. The new guidelines push Americans to prioritize protein while also urging a reduction in ultra-processed foods. Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins mentioned that for $3, families could prepare meals using wholesome ingredients like pork, eggs, tomatoes, and whole grain bread.
Nutrition expert Calley Means put this to the test by comparing two grocery carts at Walmart. One cart, filled with the suggested items, came in cheaper than one loaded with ultra-processed foods, proving healthy eating can be budget-friendly.
However, some experts criticize the emphasis on beef and high-fat dairy, noting that these foods are often more expensive than alternatives like chicken or plant-based proteins. “The new guidelines may not fully address how these protein-rich foods impact budgets,” says Joelle Johnson from the Center for Science in the Public Interest.
Food prices have risen significantly over the years. According to Michigan State University economist David Ortega, prices are about 27% higher than five years ago. Factors like the COVID-19 pandemic, droughts, and global conflicts have all contributed to this increase. While prices have stabilized somewhat, economists agree they may not return to pre-pandemic levels.
In 2023, low-income households spend around $14 a day on food, while middle-class families spend about $25. Those on food assistance typically receive around $6 per person daily. So, what people consider affordable largely depends on their income and resources. Additionally, the time spent planning and preparing meals is an important consideration. Jerold Mande, a former policymaker, emphasized that the true cost of food goes beyond grocery bills—it includes the effort needed to make healthful choices.
Convenience often drives families toward cheaper, processed options that may be less nutritious but save time in a busy schedule. As Amelia Finaret, a clinical dietician, points out, affordable foods may not always be the tastiest, further discouraging healthier choices.
In terms of the new dietary guidelines, many experts applaud the push against unhealthy processed foods. The guidelines also suggest using more affordable frozen vegetables, which are nutritious and cost-effective. Schools will also need to adapt their menus based on these guidelines, potentially favoring plant proteins over red meat. Mande is hopeful this shift can positively influence children’s diets.
However, concerns linger over the higher protein recommendations set by the new guidelines, as Finaret mentions that many individuals don’t need as much protein as advised. The push to consume more animal-based proteins could lead to unnecessary spending, particularly for families on tight budgets.
Finaret’s mini-experiment to follow the new guidelines showed that while it is possible to eat healthily on a budget, it often comes at a cost of variety and sufficient caloric intake. She found that the more affordable version of her meal plan lacked necessary energy, highlighting the challenge of meeting dietary needs on a budget.
Many believe that a focus on plant-based proteins like beans can lead to healthier and more affordable diets. Reducing unnecessary expenses, such as supplements or alcohol, can also help families eat better without breaking the bank.
Overall, the new guidelines present a mixed bag. Some aspects promote healthy eating affordably, while others could unintentionally push families toward high-cost protein sources. As Masters notes, this ongoing debate highlights the complexity of making healthy eating accessible for everyone.
Source link
cardiovascular disease,chronic disease,nutrition,Obesity,public health,RFK Jr.
