Discover Why NYC’s Top Food Critic Was Underwhelmed by Peter Luger Steak House: A Deep Dive into the Controversy

Peter Luger Steak House has been a Brooklyn staple since 1887. Known for its classic charm, it’s a place where people often expect the best steak. However, not everyone shares this sentiment. In 2019, Pete Wells, a prominent food critic for The New York Times, gave it a damning review, awarding it zero stars. He pointed out issues like slow service and inconsistent food quality.

Wells had a long history with Peter Luger, first visiting it in the 1990s. His review felt personal, as if he were sharing a painful breakup. He noted that the quality of the food had declined over the years. The beef tasted bland, the fries were gray, and the salads were soggy. Even worse, the doneness of the steak varied from plate to plate, which is baffling for such a revered steakhouse. With prices that stung, many began to wonder if it was worth the visit at all.

By October 2022, Peter Luger lost its Michelin star, a clear indicator of dropping food quality. Michelin stars are strictly based on food, not on service or ambiance. This loss highlights the very issues Wells outlined in his review – a dining experience marred by rude service and forgettable food.

Despite dissent from some loyal customers who cherish their memories at the restaurant, many agree that the food at Peter Luger no longer measures up. A restaurant famous for its steaks that’s no longer serving good steak faces serious challenges. Yet, there’s a silver lining: the burger. While the steak may disappoint, many still rave about the burger, adding a glimmer of hope for this historic eatery in the vibrant NYC dining scene.