On January 12, Scott Beardsley faced tough questions during a Senate hearing as he began his role as president of the University. One eye-catching moment came when he was asked about the nine mentions of “diversity” that mysteriously disappeared from his resume for 2025. His response? Vague and unsatisfactory.
Beardsley’s hearing didn’t instill confidence. He failed to share a clear vision for the University’s future. While he acknowledged the financial accessibility improvements made by his predecessor, Jim Ryan, he shyly avoided outlining his own goals. He stated that setting clear priorities might come off as “far too arrogant” and said he would seek the community’s input instead. While involving the community is a good approach, strong leaders often need to make tough decisions and set a clear direction. What will guide Beardsley when challenging decisions arise? He didn’t provide an answer.
Supporters argue that the University needs leadership, but we need to think deeply about what that means. The search committee that selected Beardsley had a solid definition, emphasizing the need for a visionary leader who could energize everyone on campus. So far, Beardsley has not demonstrated he meets these criteria beyond being a capable fundraiser.
The Senate hearing was a chance for Beardsley to impress the General Assembly with an inspiring vision, but that opportunity slipped by. Previous University leaders were prominent academics who could articulate ambitious goals and inspire faculty and students alike. Notably, Beardsley lacks experience in academia—he has never published in a peer-reviewed journal and is one of the few Darden School deans not granted tenure. This raises questions about his academic credentials.
Moreover, his ability to energize the university community is also in doubt. The timing of his appointment—during winter when the campus was nearly deserted—suggests a lack of confidence from the previous Board. After witnessing his performance at the hearing, it’s fair to wonder if he could genuinely inspire first-year students to embrace life at the University. Recently, 201 faculty members even called for his removal, indicating a significant lack of confidence in his leadership.
One would hope the Student Council would hold Beardsley accountable, but their recent resolution supporting him suggests otherwise. They prioritized stability over scrutiny, choosing to support Beardsley without expressing confidence in his qualifications. If they believe he’s a strong leader, why not say it clearly? Instead, their support feels lukewarm.
When asked why he did not agree to delay the presidential search despite community calls for it, Beardsley stated, “I think UVA needs a president.” This sentiment misses the mark. The University doesn’t just need a leader; it needs an exceptional one. Settling for anything less would undermine the potential of this esteemed institution.
In today’s competitive academic landscape, high standards are essential. If the community believes Beardsley isn’t right for the role, it should consider parting ways.
The University community deserves a leader who not only meets expectations but sets them high.
For more insights on academic leadership challenges, check out this Harvard Education Report.
