El Salvador’s congress recently made significant changes to the country’s political landscape. They approved reforms that remove presidential term limits, meaning President Nayib Bukele can run for office as many times as he wishes. This vote also extends presidential terms from five to six years, with the next election now scheduled for 2027.
Since taking office in 2019, Bukele has sparked mixed reactions. He is well-liked for his strong stance against crime, which has led to lower murder rates. However, this crackdown has come at a cost. Human rights advocates report that thousands have been arrested without proper justification during his anti-gang campaigns. Roughly 75,000 people have faced detention under emergency measures that have been repeatedly extended.
Critics of the reforms argue that they pave the way for one-party rule. Marcela Villatoro, an opposition MP, voiced strong concerns by stating, “Today, democracy has died in El Salvador.” On the other hand, supporters within Bukele’s party celebrated the change. Ernesto Castro, the president of the Legislative Assembly, expressed gratitude to his fellow deputies for what he called a historic decision.
The backdrop to these reforms raises important questions about democracy in El Salvador. In 2021, the country’s top court, which has judges aligned with Bukele, decided he had the right to run for re-election despite constitutional limits. This shift reflects deeper concerns about the independence of judicial institutions in the face of political power.
Additionally, public sentiment remains mixed. While many appreciate the reduction in crime, the methods used to achieve it are troubling. Activists warn that a transition from gang violence to state violence is occurring, as highlighted in an Amnesty International report. This situation is a reminder of how quickly political environments can change and the importance of staying vigilant to protect rights and democracy.
In summary, the recent reforms in El Salvador signify a crucial turning point. The country is at a crossroads, and how these changes will affect its future remains to be seen. The international community will be watching closely as events unfold. For more detailed insights, you can explore Amnesty International’s views on the issue here.