Elon Musk recently appeared in a California federal court, making claims about OpenAI and its co-founders, especially Sam Altman. He argued that they “stole a charity” from him, admitting under oath that Tesla isn’t currently pursuing artificial general intelligence (AGI). This was surprising, given that he had tweeted the opposite only weeks ago.
Musk’s lawsuit centers on the idea that he was misled into investing in OpenAI as a non-profit. He believes once the for-profit branch was created, the original mission shifted away from benefiting humanity. During his lengthy testimony, he stressed the difference between capped and uncapped profits for investors. For instance, he claimed the profit limits on Microsoft’s early investments in OpenAI have since diminished, contributing to his decision to sue.
His cross-examination revealed some contradictions. Musk had explored transitioning OpenAI to for-profit as early as 2016. After those plans fell through, he ceased regular donations, although he covered office expenses until 2020.
Musk faced tough questions about the role of his other ventures, like Tesla and Neuralink, in the AI race. He claimed Tesla was focused solely on self-driving technology, not AGI, despite previous statements suggesting otherwise.
Additionally, he was asked about past claims regarding his investments. Musk stated he invested $100 million in OpenAI, while the actual amount was $38 million. He argued that his influence in the tech space made up for the difference.
A critical part of his argument is the potential societal risks of OpenAI’s shift toward a traditional corporate model. Musk claims this change threatens the company’s safety focus. However, he acknowledged that all AI companies, including those he leads, face similar risks.
As the trial continues, experts like AI safety authority Stuart Russell and OpenAI president Greg Brockman are expected to testify, adding further depth to this complex legal battle.
Musk will return to court for more questioning, as discussions about AI’s impacts on society remain at the forefront of his case.
Source link
