Empowering Dutch Cancer Survivors: Essential Lifestyle Counseling Insights for Better Health

Recent research from the Netherlands highlights a crucial aspect often overlooked in cancer care: lifestyle counseling for survivors. This study dives into the lives of those who have fought cancer, revealing significant gaps in how they receive lifestyle advice after treatment. The insights gained here could greatly improve the support available for millions living beyond cancer.

Many cancer survivors face ongoing physical and emotional challenges long after treatment ends. Studies show that adopting healthier habits—like better nutrition, exercise, and ways to manage stress—can help ease these issues and even improve survival rates. However, current counseling methods tend to be sporadic and aren’t always tailored to individual needs.

In this study, researchers spoke with 18 cancer survivors. They included people with varying health literacy levels, ensuring diverse perspectives were heard. Most participants noted that lifestyle counseling often felt like an afterthought, requiring them to seek out information on their own. This was especially challenging for vulnerable individuals, who felt disconnected and overwhelmed navigating their post-treatment journey.

One key finding was that survivors want lifestyle counseling to be a standard part of their care, not an optional extra. They suggested integrating this support into follow-up care, with clear communication from healthcare providers about available options. Greater accessibility to counseling services was also a recurring theme. Survivors mentioned that finding and accessing support can be a significant hurdle, particularly when referral processes are complicated.

Personalization emerged as a major need. Survivors expressed that generic advice often did not cater to their individual situations or preferences. They desired flexible support that considers their unique circumstances, including physical limitations and emotional needs. Feeling understood by knowledgeable professionals was crucial for them.

This emphasis on personalized care reflects a growing shift in healthcare toward more holistic approaches. Experts suggest that integrating lifestyle counseling can empower survivors and enhance their quality of life. A promising initiative linked to this research is the GLINK project, which aims to create and assess comprehensive lifestyle interventions specifically for cancer survivors. By prioritizing personalized care, this project could set new standards in survivorship support.

Research consistently supports the idea that lifestyle changes can significantly affect a survivor’s recovery. Yet, implementing these changes can be challenging without a robust support system. Effective counseling should go beyond giving information; it should include motivational techniques, realistic goal-setting, and ongoing follow-up involving a multidisciplinary team of healthcare professionals.

With the number of cancer survivors continually increasing, optimizing lifestyle counseling is essential. It calls for action from policymakers and healthcare leaders to create systems that seamlessly integrate lifestyle advice throughout cancer care. The experiences of Dutch survivors can serve as a model for wider adaptation, ensuring that care is tailored to individual needs.

In summary, this study underscores a significant gap in current lifestyle counseling practices compared to what cancer survivors truly need. By focusing on integration, personalization, and accessibility, healthcare systems can enhance the recovery experience for many. With ongoing research supporting these findings, there is hope that future cancer care will provide not just treatment but also the lifestyle support necessary for long-term well-being.

**Research Subject**: Experiences of Dutch cancer survivors regarding lifestyle counseling.

**Research Reference**: van Aken, B., Manshanden, A., Kroeze, W. et al. “Experiences and needs of Dutch cancer survivors regarding lifestyle counselling: a qualitative study.” BMC Cancer, 25, 1761 (2025) [Read more here](https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-025-15186-6).

Source link