Exciting news for the Atlantic Coast Conference (ACC): ESPN is continuing its partnership to broadcast ACC sports until 2036. This decision brings much-needed stability to the conference and helps ease tensions with some of its schools.
The ACC is currently focused on settling ongoing lawsuits with Clemson and Florida State. These legal actions have raised concerns about financial fairness, especially compared to other conferences like the Big Ten and SEC, which have lucrative TV deals.
ESPN had to decide by February 1 whether to extend its contract, which originally began in 2016. This contract was crucial in launching the ACC Network. If ESPN had opted out, the broadcasting partnership would have ended after the 2027 season.
According to sources, ESPN’s decision to pick up the option came after the ACC agreed to some attractive changes, including more high-profile matchups in football and men’s basketball. These adjustments were championed by ACC Commissioner Jim Phillips and were discussed during a call with the ACC board of directors.
Another exciting possibility is playing more games against Notre Dame. Currently, Notre Dame has a unique relationship with the ACC, playing several football games each season. The school’s athletic director has shown interest in scheduling more matches against top teams like Clemson.
Alongside ESPN’s announcement, discussions are taking place between the ACC and the two schools regarding a new revenue distribution model. This model aims to address financial disparities among schools. Some ACC schools, particularly Clemson and Florida State, have raised concerns that they are not getting a fair share of the conference’s TV revenue.
The proposed plan includes creating a “brand” fund, where a portion of the ACC’s TV revenue would support schools that generate the most revenue, particularly in football and basketball. Clemson, Florida State, Miami, and North Carolina are expected to benefit prominently from this system.
If an agreement is reached, it’s likely that Clemson and Florida State will drop their lawsuits. Both schools are exploring their options but have not officially declared their intent to leave the ACC. Clemson’s legal action aims to understand the costs involved if they choose to exit the conference, while Florida State’s actions are similar in intent.
There has been ongoing discussion about the impact of the SEC and Big Ten’s financial strength on competition in college sports. Many ACC administrators want to ensure their schools can remain competitive, and they see this new revenue plan as a way forward.
In addition to the new revenue model, the ACC has programs in place to distribute additional funds from the College Football Playoff revenue. These funds have been designed to help member schools succeed in postseason play. While the biggest schools may benefit the most, every ACC school can access these incentives, creating a more balanced approach within the conference.
In past discussions, Florida State’s athletic director pointed out that while the school adds significant value to the ACC brand, it receives a smaller share of the revenue. This ongoing dialogue about fairness in distribution is critical as the ACC navigates its future in a rapidly changing sports landscape.
Check out this related article: Unlocking the Triple-Double Boom: Yahoo Sports AM Explores the Game-Changing Trend
Source linkespn, news, virginia-tech-hokies, college-football, duke-blue-devils, ncaa-other, stanford-cardinal, notre-dame-fighting-irish, florida-state-seminoles, mens-college-basketball, pittsburgh-panthers, clemson-tigers, north-carolina-tar-heels, wake-forest-demon-deacons, virginia-cavaliers, womens-college-basketball, california-golden-bears, louisville-cardinals, smu-mustangs, syracuse-orange, nc-state-wolfpack, miami-hurricanes, boston-college-eagles, georgia-tech-yellow-jackets, 15848852
