Exploring the Future of Health IT: What the RFI Means for CMS and ASTP/ONC Innovation

The Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT (ONC) has been quiet since the new administration took over. There’s been no formal announcement about a new national coordinator, and Steve Posnack is currently serving as the interim. This silence has sparked various rumors, including potential downsizing or a merger with the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Recently, ONC and CMS released a Request for Information (RFI) that might give us insights into their future plans. This RFI looks at digital health products for Medicare users and how to improve data sharing across health tech platforms.

One interesting area they’re exploring is how to get patients and caregivers to adopt digital identity credentials. This could boost the use of health apps. The RFI aims to support the shift towards value-based care (VBC), which focuses on improving health outcomes instead of just increasing the number of services provided. Technology plays a key role in making this transition smoother.

Moreover, the RFI highlights how technology requirements can better match the needs of providers involved in alternative payment models. It explores how certified electronic health record technology (CEHRT) can support value-based care initiatives.

The document poses questions like: What incentives would encourage accountable care organizations (ACOs) to use digital health tools more effectively? This is critical as they look to improve patient outcomes.

A notable aspect is the focus on FHIR APIs, which help different health systems communicate. The RFI asks how CMS might promote the use of open, standards-based APIs over proprietary ones, which could enhance patient access to their health information.

Interestingly, it also inquires about the potential benefits of Bulk FHIR data exports, which could ease the reporting burden on healthcare providers. By allowing CMS to calculate quality metrics more efficiently, such initiatives could improve overall healthcare delivery.

Payers are also part of this conversation. The RFI seeks to understand how CMS can help them implement APIs that simplify data sharing. Initiatives like Blue Button 2.0 have shown the potential of effective data-sharing solutions, and there’s hope for a comprehensive directory of healthcare providers that includes FHIR endpoints.

However, not everyone is as optimistic. Questions regarding the Trusted Exchange Framework and Common Agreement (TEFCA) indicate some concerns. The RFI asks how TEFCA currently aids patient access to health information and if there are better alternatives. These queries suggest that TEFCA might not yet be demonstrating its full potential.

In short, the tone of the RFI indicates a push toward accelerating work on FHIR and APIs, fostering value-based care, and enhancing interoperability among health systems. Observers, including Electronic Health Record (EHR) vendors, are keenly watching how these developments unfold.

For more insights, exploring the latest data on healthcare technologies could provide additional context on how these trends are evolving.

By understanding these trends and initiatives, we can better navigate the future of healthcare technology and its impact on patient care.

Source link