“Exploring the Tension of Reason and Ruin: A Deep Dive into Ritwik Ghatak’s ‘Jukti Takko Aar Gappo’ Through a Marxist-Psychoanalytic and Absurdist Perspective”

Admin

“Exploring the Tension of Reason and Ruin: A Deep Dive into Ritwik Ghatak’s ‘Jukti Takko Aar Gappo’ Through a Marxist-Psychoanalytic and Absurdist Perspective”

Ritwik Ghatak’s “Jukti Takko Aar Gappo” (Reason, Debate and a Story, 1974) is an impactful exploration of post-Partition Bengal. The film reflects the social decay and fragmentation of a region grappling with its identity. It’s often viewed as Ghatak’s farewell to his own experiences, rich in symbolism and deep emotion.

The movie begins on a dark note, featuring an anxious old man and three shadowy figures in black. Their dance, accompanied by an unsettling mix of music, sets a tone of confusion. These figures hint at chaos, similar to the witches in Shakespeare’s “Macbeth.” They symbolize the disorder present in the narrative and represent deeper psychological themes.

The main character, Nilkantha Bagchi, portrayed by Ghatak, is a troubled intellectual. He struggles with alcoholism and has lost his family, making him a figure of personal and societal despair. His character stands for not just personal failure but the disillusionment felt by many intellectuals during this chaotic time. While he seems defeated, he also embodies critical thinking, showcasing the tension between despair and hope.

Cinematically, the film often frames Nilkantha from below, stresssing his past authority. His journey through urban landscapes is reminiscent of absurdist literature, echoing themes of aimlessness. He encounters various characters that reflect the fears of a society in turmoil—from the disillusioned intellectual to the opportunistic bourgeoisie.

The film critiques class struggle, portraying the bourgeoisie as complicity in truth suppression. Characters like Nilkantha’s former friend abandon their ideals for comfort. Ghatak critiques both radical actions and the complacency of the upper class, pointing to a broader “crisis of authority” in society.

Women’s roles are vital. Bongobala, the refugee woman, symbolizes the motherland, illustrating the trauma of Partition. Her character performs as Devi Durga, blending sacredness with suffering—a reflection of a nation scarred by violence. This interplay highlights how trauma and loss are woven into cultural narratives.

Music and performance are essential in this film. Echoing Brecht’s epic theatre, folk songs and traditional dances disrupt the narrative, prompting viewers to think critically rather than simply engage emotionally. This approach allows the film to communicate complex social messages effectively.

Nilkantha’s tragic end signifies the extinguishing of critical thought. His death symbolizes the loss of hope and reason, reflecting a climate of despair and silence.

The film concludes in a circular manner, mirroring its beginning and emphasizing a persistent sense of absurdity. “Jukti Takko Aar Gappo” is not just an emotional reflection; it invites dialogue about the failures of postcolonial ideals and the ongoing quest for truth and identity in a fractured world.

This film remains relevant, with many viewers today resonating with its themes of displacement and disillusionment. In a world where truths often remain suppressed, Ghatak’s work continues to inspire discussion about our past, present, and future.

For more details on the film, check its IMDb page here or read about it on Wikipedia.



Source link