LONDON, ENGLAND – On January 11, 2026, a rally took place in London to support the protests in Iran. As unrest grows in Iran, reports indicate that over 500 people have been killed due to a government crackdown, with internet access severely restricted.
Recent events have brought significant attention from the U.S. government. President Donald Trump is weighing intervention options, including bolstering online support for anti-government groups and possibly launching cyber attacks against Iranian military targets. According to the Wall Street Journal, his advisors are preparing a briefing on the situation.
Matt Gertken, a geopolitical strategist, stated that if the U.S. feels compelled to act for safety or to maintain energy flow, various tools are available—ranging from cyber tactics to drone strikes. Gertken noted that striking Iran’s military or nuclear facilities could diminish the regime’s capabilities and deter further aggressive actions.
The protests in Iran began in late December, sparked by soaring prices and a collapsing currency. Historically, protests like these have challenged regimes, often leading to unrest and increased government repression. This current wave of demonstrations is noted as one of the largest in years, posing a serious threat to the Islamic regime.
Tehran’s response has been forceful, and warnings have come from Iranian officials to the U.S. and Israel against any interference, attributing the unrest to foreign influence. Gertken remarked that Iran now possesses a strong ability to retaliate, especially through attacks on regional energy infrastructures.
Trump’s approach to Iran remains fluid, emphasizing his support for the protestors. He recently expressed on social media that the U.S. is ready to assist Iranians seeking freedom. This type of rhetoric resonates widely, with many on social media echoing sentiments of solidarity, as hashtag trends have emerged showing support for the Iranian people.
The situation has also raised questions about potential consequences of U.S. involvement. Danny Citrinowicz, a senior researcher, pointed out that while military action could undermine the regime’s efforts to suppress protests, it might also unite the regime against external threats. He emphasized that the lack of clear leadership among opposition groups complicates any potential U.S. intervention.
Iran’s economic turmoil, with the rial losing half its value over the past year, serves as a backdrop to the unrest. This situation reflects deeper systemic issues within the regime, suggesting that these protests could further challenge its fragile legitimacy.
As the situation develops, the choices made by both the U.S. and Iranian officials will have lasting impacts. Understanding the historical context and current dynamics is crucial for grasping the complex interplay at work in this ongoing struggle.
Source link
Asia Economy,Politics,business news
