Explosive ‘Weapons’ Movie Review & Summary (2025): Insights from Roger Ebert

Zach Cregger’s film “Weapons” is making waves in the horror world, following his earlier success with “Barbarian.” Both films start with relatable, everyday scenarios and then take unexpected turns. In “Weapons,” Cregger dives into the chilling topic of a school shooting, but he approaches it uniquely. The story kicks off with a shocking line: “One night, 17 parents put their kids to bed for the last time.” This sets the tone for a narrative filled with tension and unease.

One of the standout elements of “Weapons” is how it refuses to firmly connect every detail. Instead, it allows viewers to interpret its deeper meanings. The plot centers around a teacher, Justine Gandy, portrayed by Julia Garner, who shows up to an empty classroom the day after this harrowing event, except for one student, Alex. The reasons behind his stay become a catalyst for suspicion against Justine. The town turns on her, asking why she wasn’t vigilant, casting her as the scapegoat for their fears.

Cregger structures the film in character-driven chapters, giving it a fresh ensemble feeling. After introducing Justine’s struggles, we meet Archer Graff, a father in despair over his missing child. This approach allows for overlapping stories that shed new light on each character’s experience. Some critics might see it as gimmicky, but this narrative style enhances the themes of hidden truths and community trauma.

The story also follows other characters, including a troubled cop, a struggling addict, and a school principal. Each actor, including Alden Ehrenreich and Benedict Wong, brings their own energy, adding depth to the narrative. Rather than a straight path from point A to B, the film shifts perspectives, keeping viewers engaged and offering new insights with each character’s story. This helps build a richer understanding of their struggles and the societal issues they face.

Visually, “Weapons” benefits greatly from the collaboration between cinematographer Larkin Seiple and editor Joe Murphy. Seiple’s creative camera work keeps the viewer immersed in the action without overwhelming the story. The film avoids the typical overdone visuals often found in horror, which helps maintain a strong connection to the narrative’s emotional core.

Interestingly, Cregger also injects humor into the film, striking a balance between horror and comedy. This choice makes characters feel real and relatable, demonstrating that even in dire moments, people can respond with humor. The film delivers on scares, especially in its unsettling final act, which contains some of the most gripping moments in recent horror history. In a landscape often filled with doom and gloom, Cregger invites the audience to laugh and reflect on the tensions in society today.

Looking back, as societal issues evolve, horror films like “Weapons” capture the zeitgeist of the moment. Surveys show that audiences are increasingly drawn to stories reflecting real-life fears and anxieties. As we face rising tensions in society, films like this serve to both entertain and provoke important conversations about community and trauma. For those tuning in, whether for chills or laughs, “Weapons” promises a wild ride that captures both horror and humanity.

Source link