The Atacama Cosmology Telescope (ACT) in Chile spent nearly two decades exploring the origins and evolution of our universe. Although it was decommissioned in 2022, its final batch of data continues to shake up the scientific community.
A recent study in the Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics used this data to investigate about 30 alternative models of the universe’s evolution. These models aim to explain puzzling cosmic phenomena that the standard cosmology model can’t. A key issue is the Hubble tension, which refers to the differing measurements of the universe’s expansion rate.
The researchers found that all these extended models were ruled out. Another study published in the same journal confirmed this Hubble tension, leaving experts facing more questions about what truly drives the universe’s expansion.
Erminia Calabrese, a cosmologist from Cardiff University, emphasized that they didn’t set out to dismiss these alternative models but aimed to study them independently. “The new observations have narrowed the theoretical possibilities,” she said. This means scientists have fewer avenues to explore in search of solutions.
When it comes to measuring the universe’s expansion rate, there are two main methods: one looks at the cosmic microwave background (the afterglow of the Big Bang), and the other examines local galaxies and supernovae. According to conventional cosmology, both should yield similar results, but they don’t. This discrepancy fuels the Hubble tension debate.
In recent years, some researchers have argued that perhaps the Hubble tension might not exist at all. However, the latest ACT data seem to confirm the problem, adding weight to this cosmological puzzle instead of resolving it.
So, why does this matter? Confirming the Hubble tension through ACT’s findings makes it clear that this discrepancy is significant. The telescope recorded the cosmic microwave background with remarkable precision, producing polarization maps that provide more detailed information than those created by the European Space Agency’s Planck spacecraft.
As Colin Hill, a cosmologist at Columbia University, noted, “Our new results show that the Hubble constant inferred from ACT agrees with that from Planck.” By offering higher resolution data, the ACT findings shed light on the unknowns surrounding the cosmic microwave background.
While ACT’s operational days may be over, the insights from its data mark a new phase for cosmologists tackling the Hubble tension. Although many models have been ruled out, this process narrows the focus for researchers. The journey to understand the universe’s expansion continues, and ACT’s legacy will guide scientists in their quest for answers.
For more on modern cosmology and the ongoing debates surrounding the Hubble tension, you can explore these resources.
Source link
Astrophysics,Cosmology,Telescopes,the Hubble tension
