Climate change is closely tied to global politics. As temperatures rise and severe weather becomes more common, countries, especially those less able to adapt, face serious challenges.
For a long time, countries focused on environmental issues in their climate discussions. They aimed to create agreements to combat climate change. But now, political divisions are making it harder to achieve collective goals. Nations are often split by economic interests and ideologies, which complicates international cooperation on climate issues.
Political leaders in many countries prioritize immediate concerns like jobs, security, and energy independence over climate initiatives. A notable example is the United States’ withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, despite its major role in global emissions. The European Union also struggles to balance its ambitious climate targets with the fossil fuel needs of some of its member countries. Meanwhile, China is the largest emitter of greenhouse gases, contributing more than a quarter of the world’s total. Although it is investing in renewable energy, its fast-growing economy means it continues to pollute significantly.
For low-income nations impacted by climate change, the situation is even tougher. These countries often endure the worst effects of environmental damage while having little say in global decisions. As natural disasters linked to climate change increase, geopolitical issues like resource competition make it harder for them to secure the help they need.
Climate change is intensifying struggles for essential resources—like water and food. Nations facing resource shortages are caught in a fierce competition. For instance, Bangladesh relies on rivers shared with India and China for fresh water. Changes in river flows can severely impact food security and agriculture, raising the stakes of geopolitical tensions over these vital resources.
As countries seek to achieve their climate goals, they may prioritize national interests instead of working together. This can weaken international agreements and slow down the needed support for vulnerable nations like Bangladesh. The global push for green technology presents another mixed bag. While renewable energy could help, access to these technologies is often uneven. Wealthier countries usually lead in these developments, leaving poorer nations at a disadvantage.
Bangladesh is actively working on adaptation strategies like building flood shelters and storm-resistant structures to cope with rising sea levels and extreme weather. However, these initiatives require substantial funds, which are hard to come by given the global political climate.
Support from wealthier nations is essential for the climate efforts of vulnerable countries. Unfortunately, this assistance can be inconsistent and slow to arrive. For example, the goal of $100 billion a year in climate finance was only met in 2022, well after its original deadline. Recent discussions have raised the bar to $300 billion annually by 2035, but this still falls short of the vast needs presented by the climate crisis.
Moreover, climate change is forcing many people from their homes. In Bangladesh, rising sea levels threaten coastal communities, and plans to relocate displaced populations are hindered by insufficient resources and support.
As global tensions increase, climate-vulnerable countries risk being overlooked in the fight for resources and assistance. The international community needs to emphasize cooperation. Together, we can help these nations adapt to and mitigate the impacts of climate change.
Check out this related article: How Installation Art at the University of the Philippines Diliman is Taking on Climate Change: A Look at Creative Solutions
Source link