On Tuesday, California Governor Gavin Newsom delivered a striking address to America, calling attention to a critical moment in our democracy. He stated, “Democracy is under assault right before our eyes,” echoing fears that many share today.
So, what’s at stake? Recently, President Trump deployed military forces to the streets of Los Angeles, claiming an urgent need for control. While some leaders suggested these forces could "detain" protesters, many demonstrations have remained peaceful. This sets the stage for a volatile interaction between military and civilians. If the military appears aggressive, it risks alienating the public, but if protesters act violently, it could bolster Trump’s support.
Experts are closely watching how these tensions unfold. Steven Levitsky, a government professor at Harvard and co-author of How Democracies Die, believes it’s crucial to have strong leaders during moments of fear. He mentioned how leaders like Newsom might galvanize those feeling silenced. “You never know who that leader is going to be, and it may be Newsom,” Levitsky noted.
Since his speech, Newsom’s visibility has surged. Engagement on social platforms jumped dramatically, with Google searches about him increasing by an astonishing 9,700%. His ability to articulate a clear message has caught attention, regardless of personal views about him.
This context isn’t new. Throughout history, leaders have faced moments where public response and support can swing power in surprising directions. The unrest following George Floyd’s death showed how quickly dynamics can shift.
Mia Bloom, an expert on extremism from Georgia State University, pointed out that crises often serve as tools for gaining power. She emphasized how the current polarized atmosphere could lead to miscalculations by those in authority.
Interestingly, recent polling indicates that many Americans, including Trump supporters, oppose his military parade in Washington, D.C., and disapprove of his immigration policies. This suggests a growing unease with the status quo.
Amidst this chaos, caution is necessary. Bloom warns against sensationalizing threats to democracy, as overblown rhetoric can lead to backfiring. History shows that peaceful protests can alter public perception, citing moments like the Iranian Revolution, where peaceful acts transformed narratives.
Newsom’s insistence on nonviolence during his call to action is vital. His leadership symbolizes a turning point that might inspire others to stand up against fear. As Levitsky put it, “Fear may spread like a virus, but courage can be contagious too.”
As we watch these events unfold, the interaction between leadership, protest, and public sentiment will play a pivotal role in shaping the future of democracy in America.