This week, representatives from 175 nations are meeting in London at the International Maritime Organization (IMO) to discuss a key agreement aimed at reducing carbon emissions from ships. Poor nations feel let down by wealthier countries over climate commitments, as they advocate for a plan that could reshape shipping over the next 25 years.
The proposed deal includes a charge on ships based on their greenhouse gas emissions. This charge would help fund climate actions in poorer countries, which are facing severe economic challenges due to climate change. However, countries like China, Brazil, and Saudi Arabia are opposing the levy. There’s also concern that the European Union might dilute the proposal.
Shipping currently contributes over 2% of global emissions, about the same as Japan. Without prompt action, this percentage is set to rise. Poorer nations fear they will suffer the most if negotiations fall apart. Ambassador Albon Ishoda from the Marshall Islands expressed frustration, stating that wealthy nations are “backsliding” on previous promises regarding climate commitments.
He pointed out that while 2023 saw an agreement to achieve net-zero emissions from shipping by 2050, results are needed soon. Ishoda called for greater leadership from major economies, emphasizing the need for action driven by science.
Some nations argue that the shipping carbon levy could push consumer prices up. Yet, experts like Simon Kofe, transport minister for Tuvalu, clarify that the impact would be minimal. Shipping costs currently make up a small fraction of the total price of goods—generally between 1% and 5%. If a carbon levy were in place, the increase in price would be negligible. For instance, a pair of shoes costing $100 might see a rise of just 72 cents due to a carbon charge.
Kofe insists that the levy would ensure those responsible for emissions bear the costs. He stressed that it is about fairness and ensuring every nation can transition to cleaner practices.
The backdrop of the IMO discussions includes global trade tensions, especially after the U.S. recently imposed tariffs on various countries. Still, the U.S. appears not to be hindering progress at these talks.
Arsenio Dominguez, IMO Secretary-General, expressed optimism that this meeting could finalize crucial measures on decarbonizing shipping. If the countries agree on the proposed strategies, it could be a pivotal moment in global efforts to combat climate change.
Constance Dijkstra, an expert from the think tank Transport and Environment, cautioned that time is of the essence. She fears the IMO is “sleepwalking into failure” by hesitating on decisive actions.
Negotiations are complex and may extend well beyond this week, as any agreement will require further refinement before it can be officially adopted. But the urgency of the climate crisis means that substantial agreement on reducing shipping emissions is no longer just a lofty goal; it’s a necessity for the future of our planet.
For more insights into global climate initiatives, you can explore the United Nations climate action resources.
Check out this related article: Unpacking the Real Reasons: Is Cost the True Barrier for Australia Hosting COP?
Source link