As hot temperatures sweep across Britain, there’s a growing urgency for leaders to rethink how we handle climate change. The UK government has set ambitious goals in its latest Spending Review, aiming to boost the country’s resilience to climate impacts. However, questions linger about how these plans will actually be implemented.
According to the latest Climate Change Committee (CCC) Progress Report, the UK has made little headway in preparing for climate challenges. The report warns that we are in a “partial to insufficient” state of readiness for future threats. Our infrastructure and communities have already been severely affected by rising extreme weather events, yet our political response has not matched the urgency of the situation.
If we keep investing in projects that aren’t built to withstand climate impacts, we’ll ultimately end up spending even more fixing the damage. This could lead to wasted resources in disaster recovery.
One major issue discussed in the CCC report is the risk of “lock-in,” where our current decisions and investments create dependencies that heighten our vulnerabilities rather than alleviate them. The report suggests that real progress will require a more comprehensive approach to adaptation.
Historically, efforts to manage extreme weather have focused narrowly on engineering solutions—like building higher flood barriers or improving drainage. These approaches only patch up a system that is becoming increasingly inadequate. They help with known risks but leave us unprepared for unexpected climate challenges.
Research indicates our bodies react to heat more acutely than we might think. Therefore, we need to be ready for surprises, not just the challenges we are already aware of. This is where shifting from adaptation to resilience becomes crucial. Resilience encourages us to understand our vulnerabilities and enhance our systems’ ability to respond to shocks and recover from them.
Historically rooted in ecology, resilience thinking recognizes that ecosystems thrive when they can diversify their responses. This means we need a similar mindset to develop our communities and infrastructures in a way that allows them to adapt to changing conditions.
Addressing climate vulnerability requires a holistic approach. Our societal vulnerabilities can be categorized into several key areas:
- Physical: buildings, roads, utilities
- Environmental: ecosystem health and resource stability
- Social: health, culture, housing
- Economic: trade, insurance, productivity
- Technological: communication and data systems
- Institutional: emergency response and planning
Climate impacts hit the most vulnerable groups hardest, exacerbating existing inequalities. Our response must recognize these disparities and aim to reduce them.
Each intervention we make presents a chance to rethink and strengthen our approach to resilience. We should aim to connect technical, institutional, and environmental solutions through strategic partnerships. If decision-makers only focus on quick fixes, they risk undermining long-term resilience.
The Spending Review has pledged £4.2 billion for flood defenses, but it’s essential that this investment goes beyond just physical barriers. It should also support community and infrastructure resilience, including long-term strategies to limit vulnerabilities.
Resilience strategies should address various aspects of issues. In flood management, for example, this could mean setting higher building standards, investing in eco-friendly solutions, and improving land use practices. All these efforts ensure that we can recover swiftly after adverse events, preventing lasting damage to our communities.
Despite the financial costs, investing in systemic resilience is crucial. It’s far better to prepare now than to become locked into outdated strategies that roadblock our future.
Now is the time to focus on developing pathways to resilience that can effectively address our vulnerabilities and prepare us for an uncertain climate future.
Dr. Shira de Bourbon Parme is Urban Wellbeing and Innovation Lead at Ramboll.