The US government faced a shutdown at 12:01 a.m. on October 1 because Congress couldn’t agree on a funding bill. Such shutdowns have become common in recent years. However, this time, there’s a significant twist. The Trump administration suggested mass layoffs of federal workers, including many scientists.
During a press conference, Trump highlighted the potential layoffs, stating, “When you shut it down, you have to do lay-offs.” The impact of this shutdown stretches far beyond job losses. Many scientific operations have paused, putting vital research on hold. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) has stopped its in-house research and halted new patients at its hospital. If the shutdown goes on, other organizations like the National Science Foundation and Environmental Protection Agency will also stop issuing new grants.
Joanne Padrón Carney, a government-relations officer at the American Association for the Advancement of Science, noted that shutdowns can severely affect scientific research, especially the longer they last. The last significant shutdown under Trump in 2018 lasted 35 days, costing around $5 billion and disrupting many scientific programs.
Interestingly, public sentiment is divided. While many scientists are anxious about the shutdown’s impact, some believe it may give Congress a chance to push back against the Trump administration’s policies, which have already led to budget cuts and significant disruptions in research. At a protest in Washington D.C., NIH neuroscientist Mark Histed expressed concerns, saying, “American science is being destroyed.”
The stakes are high. This shutdown is unique because it threatens widespread layoffs. According to guidance from the White House Office of Management and Budget, agencies are told to consider laying off employees whose funding expired and whose projects do not align with the administration’s priorities. Carney warns this could lead to a significant loss of expertise in critical scientific agencies.
For context, past shutdowns didn’t carry the risk of mass firings. However, we’re seeing a shift in how such actions can directly impact the scientific landscape. As research operations slow down, the public’s trust in science may also be affected.
For a broader perspective, according to a 2021 report by the Congressional Research Service, significant funding cuts can lead to decreased innovation and economic growth. So, as the debate continues on Capitol Hill, the future of American science hangs in the balance.
As this situation unfolds, it’s clear that the consequences extend beyond federal employees and their jobs. The health of scientific research in the US could be at risk as well, affecting everything from public health to technology advancements.
Source link
Funding,Government,Politics,Science,Humanities and Social Sciences,multidisciplinary