How the MD Gas Plant Bill Threatens Our Economy and Environment: Insights from Advocates

Maryland’s energy costs are on the rise, sparking debate over potential solutions. Some leaders in the Maryland General Assembly propose adding more dispatchable power plants to meet demand. These plants can quickly adjust power output, often using natural gas.

However, environmentalists are not on board. Mike Tidwell, head of the Chesapeake Climate Action Network, warns that building new gas plants contradicts Maryland’s goal of achieving net-zero carbon emissions by 2045. Tidwell argues that increasing reliance on natural gas would move Maryland further away from its climate targets, especially with the impacts of climate change hitting close to home, like rising sea levels.

Recent research suggests that building new gas plants may not be the most economical solution either. A Google study indicates that other options could better meet Maryland’s energy needs without the environmental drawbacks. For instance, virtual power plants, which utilize a network of smaller, renewable energy sources—like solar panels and batteries—are a more cost-effective and sustainable approach.

Tidwell emphasizes the benefit of investing in renewables over gas. He claims there is substantial evidence showing that expanding battery usage and solar power can be accomplished faster and at a lower cost than constructing new gas facilities.

Virtual power plants are particularly appealing because they can adjust their energy output based on demand, making them a flexible solution for today’s energy challenges.