How Trump’s Assault on Public Lands Poses a Threat to Our Health: An In-Depth Opinion

U.S. national parks have often been called “America’s best idea.” But lately, there’s been concern over their future. Recent events show a shift that could harm these treasured lands and our well-being.

During President Trump’s time in office, the National Park Service (NPS) cut about 1,000 employees, which is around 9% of its workforce. The government has also planned to terminate leases for over 34 visitor centers and museums. These changes, along with potential budget cuts and privatization, threaten the parks and our health.

Spending time in nature is vital for physical and mental health. The World Health Organization states that nature is a major source of well-being. Research from Australian scientists shows that protected parks contribute a staggering $6 trillion to global mental health every year—helping people feel better and reducing healthcare costs. Just being in a park for as little as 30 minutes can enhance heart health and boost the immune system.

Parks also foster social connections. When people gather in nature for activities, they build friendships and feel happier. Studies indicate that outdoor settings can spark creativity and kindness, leading to a more cooperative community. Health care professionals increasingly support programs that utilize parks for their positive effects on mental health.

In 1916, President Woodrow Wilson established the NPS to protect these lands for future generations. Since then, every president, except Trump, has protected more land than they’ve removed. However, the agency faces major challenges. With a $22 billion maintenance backlog, fewer rangers mean less safe and accessible parks. Many vital services are under strain. For instance, at the Grand Canyon, a broken water pipeline remains unrepaired, impacting visitor experience and safety.

Privatization of park services is also on the table. Trump’s administration has explored options to turn over campgrounds and food services to private companies. This could lead to higher fees, making it harder for families and seniors to access these spaces. There’s a growing worry that if parks become more commercialized, the additional crowding and pollution could detract from their natural beauty and health benefits.

Moreover, the push for fossil fuel extraction endangers these lands. Recent policy changes have rolled back conservation protections, inviting more mining and drilling. This not only affects wildlife but also poses a risk to human health. Pollution can lead to respiratory issues, and chemicals from oil extraction threaten drinking water quality.

Despite generating $55 billion in 2023 with a relatively small budget of $4.7 billion, national parks are deteriorating. Many experts suggest that we need to find new funding sources to preserve these lands. One idea is to involve local Native communities in managing the parks, which could lead to more sustainable practices.

Our health and the health of our environment are interconnected. Ensuring that access to nature remains intact is crucial for our well-being and the future of our communities. Nature is not just a refuge. It’s an essential investment in our lives, economy, and planet.

For further information on the economic impact of national parks, check out the National Park Service’s report here.

Source link