How Trump’s Reversal of Climate Regulations and Austerity Measures is Shaping Global Environmental Politics

As Donald Trump began his second term in January 2025, he made significant environmental policy changes that stirred up geopolitical tensions. His executive orders emphasized energy independence, focusing heavily on fossil fuels while reducing production from renewables. This left other nations and climate scientists concerned about years of climate progress being reversed, with potential risks to public health and the environment.

On his first day in office, Trump signed an order called “Putting America First In International Environmental Agreements.” This meant the U.S. withdrew from the Paris Agreement for a second time, cutting ties that had been established to address climate change. The executive order redirected funds intended for international climate obligations toward domestic energy initiatives, raising eyebrows among allies. They worried that this decision would hinder global efforts in climate action.

The administration’s first moves included eliminating many of the previous administration’s environmental regulations. This meant weaker standards for vehicle emissions, longer timelines for adopting electric vehicles, and a rollback of rules on carbon emissions from power plants. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) was instructed to lift restrictions seen as burdensome to the fossil fuel industry. As a result, the U.S. pivoted heavily toward coal, oil, and natural gas, moving away from the commitment to address climate change that had been forming over the past decades.

Moreover, the administration made changes allowing higher methane emissions, a potent greenhouse gas, which further weakened climate measures. The push for energy independence also led to proposals for drilling in protected areas, like the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, igniting fierce resistance from environmental advocates.

Funding for climate research took a hit as well. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) halted studies on climate-related health issues, which include the impact of heatwaves and diseases linked to climate change. NASA’s Earth Science division also faced budget cuts, depriving scientists of crucial data needed to study warming trends and environmental changes. Many federal websites removed vital climate information, making it harder for researchers to gauge the climate challenges facing the nation.

The renewable energy sector faced tough challenges, as increased tariffs on solar panels and wind turbines raised costs and caused project delays. As fossil fuel interests dominated, funding that could have gone to clean energy stalled, leaving innovators and businesses unable to compete effectively.

Public dissatisfaction led to protests among EPA employees and legal actions from states and environmental groups. California, for example, sought to maintain its stricter emissions standards, leading to a significant legal battle over the rollback of environmental protections. Other states joined in this fight, aiming to protect their own climate policies from federal changes.

The implications of these changes were vast, leading to a rise in greenhouse gas emissions and reducing the U.S.’s role in global climate leadership. The shift towards fossil fuels worried public health experts, who noted increasing concerns over environmental degradation and health crises tied to climate change.

Additionally, countries like Canada and those in the European Union reacted by imposing carbon tariffs on American goods, arguing the U.S. was failing to meet its climate obligations. This meant added costs for American exporters and weakened the U.S. position in the clean energy market.

In summary, Trump’s second term marked a significant departure from proactive climate policy. Decisions made from 2020 onwards have posed serious obstacles to achieving future emissions targets. The “America First” strategy, while aimed at economic growth, resulted in significant environmental challenges. Moving forward, a fundamental shift is required in how America approaches climate change and clean energy to ensure a sustainable future.

For further reading on the effects of environmental policy changes, check out the insights from The New York Times and CNN.

Check out this related article: Are Plastics Polluting Our Soil, Food, and Bodies? Discover What Can Be Done to Stop It!