Hungary’s Controversial Decision to Withdraw from the ICC Amidst Netanyahu’s Visit: What It Means for International Justice

Hungary has decided to leave the International Criminal Court (ICC), announcing this shift just as Prime Minister Viktor Orban welcomed Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to Budapest. This meeting marks Netanyahu’s first visit to Europe since the ICC issued an arrest warrant for him in May 2024 due to alleged war crimes, including accusations of starvation as a method of warfare.

Netanyahu is accused of being responsible for some serious violations, which have raised eyebrows internationally. The ICC relies on member nations to enforce arrest warrants, and as one of the signatories of the Rome Statute that founded the court in 2002, Hungary had a legal obligation to arrest him. Instead, Netanyahu received a grand reception in Budapest, where he was greeted with a red carpet and formal discussions with Orban.

Hungary has strong ties with Israel, and public sentiment reflects this closeness. Many Hungarians have shown support for Israel through various forms of expression, especially in light of the ongoing conflict. For instance, the River Danube has a Holocaust memorial adorned with yellow ribbons, symbolizing solidarity with hostages taken during recent tensions.

According to Hungary’s State Secretary for International Communication, Zoltan Kovacs, the withdrawal process from the ICC will begin as a part of Hungary’s constitutional and legal obligations. If Hungary proceeds with this withdrawal, it would become the only country in the European Union not affiliated with the ICC.

The European reaction to the ICC warrant has been mixed. While some countries, like Ireland and Spain, expressed intentions to arrest Netanyahu if he visits, others, such as France and Germany, have shown hesitation, questioning the ICC’s jurisdiction over non-member states like Israel. Currently, more than 120 countries are members of the Rome Statute, while major players like the United States, China, and Russia are not.

This situation is notable as it represents a significant escalation from the ICC, which has previously targeted leaders such as Vladimir Putin for war crimes. The US has consistently criticized the ICC under both President Biden and former President Trump, who even imposed sanctions on ICC officials investigating American personnel.

Yet, the ICC also issued warrants against Hamas leaders, highlighting the broader context of ongoing violence in the region. This dual approach indicates a complex landscape where accountability is sought for various actions in the conflict.

In conclusion, Hungary’s withdrawal from the ICC during Netanyahu’s visit underscores a dramatic shift in geopolitical alliances and raises important questions about international law enforcement. As these events develop, the implications for both regional stability and international legal practices warrant close attention.

For more details on ICC operations and member states, you can visit the ICC’s official website.

Check out this related article: Unlikely Tariff Targets: From Abandoned Whaling Stations to Secluded Military Bases on a Deserted Island