ICJ Recognizes Right to a Healthy Environment: A Groundbreaking Climate Ruling You Need to Know About

The International Court of Justice (ICJ) recently made headlines by declaring that a clean and sustainable environment is a human right. This advisory opinion suggests that countries not taking action against greenhouse gas emissions might be violating international law, as reported by DW on July 23.

This ruling, while not legally binding, could pave the way for holding major companies accountable for climate-related damages. According to bne IntelliNews, just 111 of the largest fossil fuel firms are responsible for about $28 trillion in economic harm related to climate change. Shockingly, the biggest ten companies alone account for half of this damage.

ICJ President Yuji Iwasawa emphasized that human activities drive greenhouse gas emissions with far-reaching effects. He warned of the urgent threat climate change poses and that governments now have a legal responsibility to prevent environmental harm. This means setting ambitious national climate targets.

The case was initiated by Vanuatu, with strong support from developing countries seeking clarity on states’ roles in combating climate change. This ruling represents the largest case ever heard by the UN’s top court. Mary Robinson, former UN high commissioner for human rights, noted that this is a significant tool for protecting people from climate change impacts.

Vanuatu’s Climate Change Minister Ralph Regenvanu celebrated the decision, calling it a “landmark milestone.” He pointed out that for the first time, the ICJ has directly addressed a major threat to humanity. Although the advisory opinion itself is not enforceable, its moral and legal weight could reshape climate negotiations ahead of the COP30 summit in Brazil this November.

Experts, like Joana Setzer from the Grantham Research Institute, believe this opinion marks a turning point for climate litigation. It offers guidance on countries’ legal obligations and will be essential for courts and advocates seeking accountability. Joie Chowdhury, a senior attorney at the Center for International Environmental Law, highlighted that this ruling could establish a blueprint for holding high-emission countries responsible. “This is about accountability,” she noted, urging an end to empty promises.

This development follows a global trend where climate action is increasingly tied to legal and human rights frameworks. A recent survey by the Pew Research Center found that 67% of respondents in 19 countries view climate change as a major threat. As awareness grows, it becomes clearer that the intersection of environmental rights and human rights is becoming an essential part of global discourse.

For more detailed insights on global climate issues, you can explore further through sources like the [UN Environment Programme](https://www.unep.org/) and related scientific reports.

Source link

bne, business new europe, REM, climate crisis, ESG, renewables, BRICS, Russia, China, India, South Africa, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States, the European Union, G7, Middle East, Saudi arabia, Asia, China,