Implementing Effective Conduct Rules: A Crucial Test for University Officials in Managing Protests

Universities have long faced challenges with student protests. They’ve often been lenient towards movements aligned with progressive causes like Black Lives Matter or climate action. So, what’s different when it comes to anti-Israel demonstrations?

David L. Bernstein and I argue for consistent enforcement of rules across the board. Historically, universities tolerated anti-apartheid protests, even when those protests broke school rules. But would they allow pro-apartheid rallies? It’s unlikely. In fact, schools have even shut down satirical events, like affirmative action bake sales, that didn’t cross any legal lines but challenged popular narratives.

The core question university officials need to consider is this: If a group promoting white supremacy engaged in similar protests, would there be rules in place to stop them? If the answer is yes, then the same rules should apply to all groups, including anti-Israel demonstrators. This isn’t about labeling one group as similar to another; it’s about fairness. Universities must uphold their policies evenly, regardless of the students’ political beliefs.

Recent trends show that universities are increasingly scrutinizing their responses to protests. A survey by the American Council on Education found that 60% of institutions are reevaluating their policies on free speech and protest activities. This shift highlights a growing awareness of the need for balance and fairness in handling campus issues.

In essence, universities should aim for consistent policy enforcement. It’s about maintaining a safe and respectful learning environment for everyone, no matter their view.



Source link