The Supreme Court has mentioned that the approval of the state government is just not essential to register a case against a central government worker working in a state. If CBI is registering a case against such an worker beneath any central legislation, then it could possibly do it even with out taking the approval of the state government.
The Supreme Court has given this resolution on the enchantment of CBI against a choice of Andhra Pradesh High Court. The High Court has booked A., an officer of the Central Excise Department working in Nandyal (Kurnool) district of Andhra Pradesh. CBI investigation in two bribery circumstances against Satish Kumar was cancelled. These circumstances had been registered beneath the central legislation Prevention of Corruption Act.
High Court’s resolution
The accused had argued earlier than the High Court that the normal consent for investigation was given to the CBI by the government of undivided Andhra Pradesh in 1990. In 2014, the state was divided into two components – Andhra Pradesh and Telangana. After the bifurcation of the state, the normal consensus obtained beneath the Delhi Police Special Establishment (DSPE) Act 1946 has lapsed. Accepting this argument, the High Court canceled the CBI FIR.
Supreme Court’s reasoning
While giving its verdict on the enchantment of CBI, the Supreme Court bench headed by Justice CT Ravikumar has rejected the argument of the accused. The Supreme Court has mentioned that the legal guidelines relevant in undivided Andhra Pradesh will stay relevant to each the states shaped after division till the state government modifications them. Also, this case is against a central government worker. The allegation has additionally been made beneath the Central Law (Prevention of Corruption Act). In such a state of affairs, CBI didn’t want the approval of the state government to register the case.
Also learn:
Grand conference of NRIs in Bhubaneswar, President of Trinidad may be the chief guest
