Indiana ACLU Takes Legal Action Against Governor Over Control of University Boards: What You Need to Know

The ACLU of Indiana is suing Governor Mike Braun. The lawsuit centers on a new law that gives him complete control over selecting Indiana University’s board of trustees. This change comes after last-minute additions to Indiana’s budget bill by Republican lawmakers, aimed at increasing state oversight of public colleges.

Under the new law, Governor Braun can appoint all nine board members of Indiana University, ending a tradition where alumni have elected trustees since 1891. According to the ACLU, this move is unconstitutional and specifically targets Indiana University, violating both its long-standing practices and Indiana’s constitution.

Justin Vasel, a candidate for the board, has joined the ACLU in the lawsuit. He argues that this law undermines democratic governance at the university. “It threatens IU’s 134-year-old tradition of alumni representation,” he stated. Before this law, alumni—over 790,000 of them—could vote, making their collective power larger than the populations of several U.S. states like Wyoming and Vermont.

Six candidates had already announced their intent to run for trustee positions, with the election set to begin just before the law was passed. Instead of allowing alumni to vote, the governor now has the discretion to appoint board members, provided that at least five are alumni and five are residents of Indiana. He can also remove previously elected board members at will.

Governor Braun defended this law, claiming that low alumni voter turnout during recent elections didn’t reflect true representation. “A small group was effectively deciding who got elected,” he said, asserting a need for broader oversight.

The next trustee meeting is scheduled for June 12, amidst growing scrutiny over how this legislation was handled. Critics have pointed out that there was no public discussion or hearings about these significant changes, which were inserted into a lengthy budget bill without notice.

Beyond Indiana University, the changes reflect a pattern of increased state control over public education in Indiana. For instance, earlier controversies involve state funds being criticized for supporting the Kinsey Institute, known for its work on human sexuality. Such disputes highlight a broader trend where state officials aim to direct the university’s focus and activities.

Legal experts have pointed out that this shift in governance could have long-lasting impacts on Indiana University’s independence and may set a precedent for other institutions in the state. Ken Falk, ACLU’s legal director, expressed concern that every public university in Indiana allows some alumni participation in board selections, questioning why Indiana University should be the exception.

This case has garnered noteworthy attention on social media, with many alumni expressing their outrage. The unfolding events at Indiana University are raising critical discussions about governance, alumni rights, and the future of public higher education in Indiana.

For further context, you can refer to this report from the Indiana Capital Chronicle, which details the implications of the law and public reactions.

Source link