DUBAI, United Arab Emirates (AP) — Recently, the speaker of Iran’s parliament, Mohammad Bagher Qalibaf, declared that Iran views all European Union militaries as terrorist groups. This statement came after the EU labeled Iran’s paramilitary Revolutionary Guard a terror group due to its harsh response to protests in the country.
Qalibaf’s announcement is mostly symbolic. Iran has, since 2019, used a law to label other countries’ militaries as terrorist organizations after the U.S. designated the Revolutionary Guard as such. This move highlights the increasing tensions in the Middle East, especially with U.S. President Donald Trump considering military action against Iran. Iran is also conducting live-fire military drills in the vital Strait of Hormuz, a significant route for global oil trade.
During the parliamentary session, Qalibaf and other lawmakers donned the uniforms of the Revolutionary Guard, expressing support for the military force that controls much of Iran’s missile capabilities and economy. Qalibaf argued that by targeting the Revolutionary Guard, Europe is undermining its own safety. “They have shot themselves in the foot,” he said, criticizing European leaders for following U.S. directives.
The meeting included chants of “Death to America!” and “Death to Israel!” from lawmakers, reflecting the pervasive anti-Western sentiment in Iran.
As Trump weighs his options, he has set two key conditions for military action: the killing of peaceful protesters or large-scale executions amid the unrest. He has also increasingly focused on Iran’s nuclear ambitions. Recent conflicts, including a war in June involving Israel, saw the U.S. bomb Iranian nuclear sites, raising concerns about Iran possibly attempting to hide its nuclear activities.
Trump has not confirmed his plans, stating that there are varied opinions on whether the U.S. should act against Iran. He emphasized the need for Iran to negotiate a deal to prevent them from obtaining nuclear weapons but expressed uncertainty about the likelihood of such negotiations taking place.
In Iran, Ali Larijani, a key security official, mentioned that negotiations are being structured. However, public discussions with the U.S. remain unclear, as Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei has dismissed the idea of direct talks.
This complicated scenario demonstrates how longstanding tensions can influence current events. Understanding the historical context helps us see why these nations remain at odds and the potential impact of their decisions on global stability.
For further insights on U.S.-Iran relations, you can refer to this report from the Council on Foreign Relations that explores the intricate dynamics at play.
Source link
General news, Donald Trump, Iran, Terrorism, Mohammad Bagher Qalibaf, Europe, European Union, Iran government, Military and defense, International News, Send to Apple News, Politics, World news, Ali Larijani
