On March 28, a powerful 7.7 magnitude earthquake jolted Myanmar, causing the Sagaing Fault to shift at speeds surpassing 3 miles per second. This fault shares similarities with California’s notorious San Andreas Fault, known for holding the potential for massive earthquakes.
A recent study in the journal PNAS highlights how remote sensing technology, specifically satellite imaging, can help predict the behavior of faults like Sagaing and San Andreas. Researchers found that such faults could unleash earthquakes that might be significantly more powerful than those recorded in the past.
The team analyzed how the Sagaing Fault moved during the earthquake. They noted it had a long rupture, about 510 kilometers (317 miles), and attributed it to the fault’s smooth structure. Before this event, experts anticipated an earthquake in a segment that hadn’t seen significant activity since 1839. This theory, known as the seismic gap hypothesis, suggested that “stuck” sections would eventually release pressure. Interestingly, the recent quake not only affected this section but also extended over an additional 124 miles (200 kilometers), indicating that the fault released even more stress than anticipated.
Strike-slip faults, like Sagaing, occur when tectonic plates grind past each other. This constant friction builds stress, which, when released, results in earthquakes. The Myanmar quake sheds light on the potential for similar events along the San Andreas Fault. Both faults are long and straight, which means they could behave similarly in the future.
Jean-Philippe Avouac, director at Caltech’s Center for Geomechanics, pointed out that future earthquakes may not simply mirror past ones. Each rupture can vary significantly, leading to more considerable seismic events than expected based on historical patterns.
The study’s first author, Solène Antoine, emphasized the importance of their new imaging techniques to measure how much the ground moved. For this quake, a 500-kilometer (311-mile) section of the Sagaing Fault shifted about 9 feet (3 meters), showing the necessity to refine models that project seismic hazards. Current models often rely on historical earthquake data, which may not fully capture the spectrum of potential seismic activity.
Moreover, relying solely on historical records can be misleading. Avouac pointed out that these records often don’t cover enough time to represent all possible earthquake patterns. Physics-based models could enhance predictions by incorporating real-time observations, leading to more accurate forecasts.
While exact earthquake predictions remain elusive, each new finding from studies like this helps us better understand seismic risks and prepare for these natural disasters. According to the United Nations, over 1,000 earthquakes are recorded globally each year, emphasizing the need for continued research and awareness in seismology.
For more insights into seismic activity and safety measures, you can refer to the United States Geological Survey (USGS).
Source link
Earthquakes,seismology
