In 1974, Studs Terkel published Working, capturing the anxiety of American workers during the Third Industrial Revolution. This era, marked by automation and globalization, left many feeling obsolete. Terkel wrote about a deep fear: “the planned obsolescence of people.” Workers were haunted by the thought of becoming redundant in a world saturated with unnecessary goods.
Now, as we navigate the Fourth Industrial Revolution, this fear feels relevant again, but with new urgency. College-educated professionals—the supposed winners of the digital age—are beginning to worry about their own job security as AI takes over roles once thought secure.
The initial phase of the AI revolution flooded the internet with inexpensive content and expertise. Tools like ChatGPT and Google Gemini changed how we access information and sparked misinformation, reshaping media and education along the way. But we are now entering a more troubling time marked by substantial job losses.
Recent reports show that AI was a factor in around 55,000 layoffs in 2025. The digital landscape is fraught; many of the jobs created last month in healthcare and social services focus on caring for an ageing population, highlighting a grim trend. A consulting firm’s AI expert pointed out that advancements like GPT-5.2 are increasingly capable of tackling complex tasks efficiently, suggesting that widespread economic impacts are imminent.
January alone saw over 108,000 job cuts—an alarming spike. Major companies like Amazon and Meta have significantly reduced their workforce, hinting at a broader issue: fewer job opportunities and a diminishing sense of security for those in traditionally stable professions.
Concern is growing among business leaders. Dario Amodei, CEO of Anthropic, predicts a potential 10-20% rise in unemployment due to AI in the coming years. Microsoft’s Mustafa Suleyman warns that many white-collar jobs could vanish within 18 months. Such predictions are triggering debates over whether this is an attack on the middle class or merely a byproduct of capitalism evolving.
The political implications are significant. Jobs form the backbone of America’s social contract, and the fear of job loss can fuel unrest. Franklin Roosevelt warned us long ago that economic despair breeds instability, and we are witnessing echoes of that sentiment today. Displaced workers from past industrial revolutions have already reshaped our political landscape, and as we face potential job losses again, the response could be explosive.
While past movements, like Occupy Wall Street, channeled anger into left-wing politics, today’s discontent seems to resonate differently. Many young people have been drawn to populist movements, including MAGA, reflecting their frustrations. Without proactive measures, the rapid transformation brought by AI could lead to significant political upheaval.
As we look to the future, both major political parties face challenges. They are caught between the demands of their supporters and the pressing realities of an automated economy. For example, republicans support AI projects for national security yet risk alienating local voters concerned about rising utility costs from AI data centers.
Interestingly, figures from across the political spectrum, such as Bernie Sanders and Ron DeSantis, are starting to voice concerns about the impacts of AI on jobs and local communities. This strange alliance signals a growing awareness of the need for better regulation of tech.
In communities across the U.S., we are beginning to see grassroots movements pushing back against the unchecked expansion of AI. Residents are questioning the presence of massive data centers that could strain local resources. For instance, in Pennsylvania, a proposed data center faced rejection due to concerns over energy costs.
As the landscape shifts, it is essential to consider how these changes might affect future policies. The rise of AI could force governments to rethink economic models. Discussions around Universal Basic Income or taxation on “robot labor” may become central in debates as we strive to protect a collapsing consumer economy.
Ultimately, we are at a crossroads. The AI revolution could either fracture existing political alliances or forge new ones. If we leave these issues unaddressed, the backlash could lead to chaos.
In the end, the AI revolution represents a double-edged sword. It may threaten to erase traditional jobs, but it also poses a critical test for our democracy. As history teaches us, when large groups feel abandoned, they can create significant change. The question is: how will we respond?
Source link
Age of Anxiety,ai,Artificial intelligence,Chris Hayes,fourth industrial revolution,Ro Khanna,Ron DeSantis,Studs Terkel
