Israel’s military is considering plans to retake Gaza in its ongoing fight against Hamas. This proposal is still pending approval by Israel’s security cabinet. The chief of staff of the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) drafted these plans with support from far-right ministers who have been advocating for more aggressive measures.
Sources say that the change in U.S. administration has influenced this thinking. With Donald Trump back in the White House, Israel feels less constrained by the previous administration’s approach, which aimed to ease tensions rather than escalate them. An official claimed, “Trump wants us to win the war.” There seems to be a strong American interest in defeating Hamas, further motivating Israel’s actions.
According to the plans, the IDF would mobilize multiple combat divisions to invade Gaza and curb Hamas’s influence. They intend to control significant portions of the territory, pushing Gaza’s 2.2 million people into smaller areas along the coast. This approach would resemble a return to occupation, nearly two decades after Israel withdrew from the region in 2005.
Critics argue this could lead to devastating consequences for civilians, displacing millions and confining them to limited areas where they would rely on aid. Data from the United Nations indicates that existing humanitarian conditions are already dire, with reports of escalating violence affecting aid workers and civilians alike. For example, a recent incident involved an Israeli tank shell striking a UN compound, resulting in the death of an aid worker.
Historically, Israel occupied Gaza for 38 years until the unilateral pullout in 2005. Since then, Israeli military operations have mostly involved temporary incursions aimed at dismantling Hamas’s operational capabilities. This new strategy emerging from the current leadership indicates a dramatic shift—one focused on long-term military control and governance.
Notably, recent statistics reveal a worrying humanitarian crisis. Israeli airstrikes reportedly killed over 50,000 Palestinians during ongoing operations. The IDF claims to have targeted key Hamas leaders and infrastructure, dismantling much of their military capabilities, including extensive tunnel networks.
Despite this military position, public sentiment in Israel is complex. Surveys indicate that many Israelis support a ceasefire and a deal for the release of hostages. However, the inability to eliminate Hamas has stirred criticism of previous military strategies, leading to calls for a more decisive approach.
Defense analysts warn that achieving these ambitious goals may not be feasible due to existing troop levels and the challenges of maintaining a long-term military presence. Israeli forces recently resumed airstrikes after breaking a ceasefire, signifying a renewed commitment to the conflict.
As Israeli leadership, including Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, expresses intentions to fundamentally change Gaza, it becomes clear that the stakes are high. This conflict, already marked by significant loss of life and suffering, has the potential to reshape the region for years to come.
While the situation remains fluid, the significance of history should not be overlooked, as one can draw parallels with earlier conflicts. Understanding these dynamics is essential for grasping the possible futures of both Gaza and Israel. For current insights, consider following updates from credible sources like The Times of Israel and Al Jazeera.






