A powerful flyer reading “journalism is not a crime” made an appearance outside the “Correspondents’ Corridor” at the Pentagon recently. It was a quiet protest against a new policy introduced by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, which many feel restricts press access severely.
This policy has alarmed media attorneys and advocates who argue it threatens routine reporting. In response, news organizations are opting to forgo their access to the Pentagon rather than comply. They plan to keep covering military news from the outside, a stance that highlights growing tensions between the press and government officials.
As reporters began turning in their press passes, some took notice of the impactful poster. The next day, it was gone, even though an older plaque promoting “free flow of information” remained in the hallway—a stark reminder of what many feel is being undermined.
Press freedom supporters argue that Hegseth is moving away from these principles. He is accused of limiting reporters’ ability to communicate freely with sources. As the gatekeeper of access, Hegseth left journalists little choice. Though some hoped negotiations might ease concerns, no agreement was reached on key legal and ethical issues.
Interestingly, only one outlet, One America News, has stated it accepted Hegseth’s terms. Meanwhile, more prominent pro-Trump networks like Fox News and Newsmax have refused the new rules, expressing worries about losing independent journalism.
General Jack Keane voiced strong criticism, stating that the administration seems intent on controlling the narrative, leading to a situation where reporters are not genuinely reporting but merely echoing official statements.
The organization Military Reporters and Editors condemned the new policy as a “serious attack on the First Amendment.” They emphasize that the American public deserves transparent reporting, especially about how their tax dollars fund military operations.
Inside the Pentagon, some military officers have expressed their dismay over the restrictions, revealing a sense of regret and concern for the chasm forming between military and civilian life. Their conversations suggest that this move could deepen existing divides rather than foster understanding.
Tony Bertuca, chief Pentagon editor for Inside Defense, noted that this policy fits a troubling trend of limiting press engagement at the Pentagon. He pointed out the noticeable drop in press briefings and a shift towards one-way communication through social media.
This new credentialing policy complicates the already challenging task of holding officials accountable—especially in a place responsible for critical decisions involving vast sums of public money.
Despite the difficulties, Bertuca remains steadfast. He understands that covering the defense sector—especially with a budget reaching $1 trillion—means there will always be stories to pursue. He insists, “I’m not going to stop doing my job.”
As media organizations navigate this evolving landscape, the ongoing discussion about press freedom and accountability remains more crucial than ever.
For further insights into press freedom issues, consider checking resources from the Committee to Protect Journalists here.
