CARACAS, Venezuela (AP) — On Monday, Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro voiced a strong response to the U.S. military’s increased presence near his country, stating he would “declare a republic in arms” if attacked. This remark came as the U.S. plans to enhance its naval forces in the Caribbean, aiming to combat threats from drug cartels in Latin America.
The U.S. Navy is already deploying several ships, including guided-missile destroyers and amphibious assault ships, adding over 4,000 sailors and Marines to the region. This military build-up reflects President Donald Trump’s strategy to address drug trafficking, which he links to the flow of illegal substances into U.S. cities.
Maduro condemned this action as an “extravagant, unjustifiable, and immoral threat,” claiming it intensifies military pressure on Venezuela. He also mobilized troops along the coast and called for civilians to join a militia in preparation for potential conflict.
Joining him, Venezuelan Foreign Minister Yván Gil argued that the U.S. narrative is misleading. He referenced a U.N. report indicating that 87% of cocaine from Colombia exits through the Pacific Ocean, not Venezuela. He warned that an attack on Venezuela could destabilize the entire region, emphasizing the need to halt U.S. deployments.
Despite the mounting tensions, Maduro maintains that he is the legitimate president, despite international doubts. He reiterated that two communication channels exist between his government and the Trump administration, noting a focus on dialogue.
The political climate in Venezuela is tense, marked by opposition figures like María Corina Machado urging international pressure on Maduro. She praised the U.S. naval actions as a necessary step against what she calls a “criminal enterprise.”
Experts note that military interventions can have unintended consequences. Dr. Laura F. H. Serrano, a Latin American relations scholar, states that history has shown military actions often lead to prolonged conflicts and instability. She urges dialogue over military response, citing that many Latin American nations prefer peaceful resolutions.
As of now, the world watches closely. Social media is buzzing with opinions, showing sharp divides. Some supporters hail the military presence as a necessary stand against drugs, while others criticize it as an escalation of conflict.
In the coming weeks, this situation will likely evolve. Observers are left wondering how Venezuela will respond and what the broader implications may be for regional stability.
Source link