Mark Ruffalo recently defended Billie Eilish after she received backlash from Kevin O’Leary. This came after Eilish made bold statements against ICE during her Grammy acceptance speech, declaring, “no one is illegal on stolen land” and “F–k ICE.”
Ruffalo took to Threads, responding to O’Leary’s comment telling Eilish to “shut your mouth and just entertain.” He said, “It’s hilarious that you expect us to listen to you, yet you criticize a real artist who speaks to millions.”
Ruffalo’s response highlights a common tension in the entertainment world: the clash between artists using their platforms for social issues and critics who prefer they focus solely on entertainment.
Eilish wasn’t alone in her stand. Her brother, Finneas, also chimed in on the conversation, pointing out the outrage from powerful white men. He noted, “We can literally see your names in the Epstein files.”
The critique of ICE isn’t new. Celebrities like Bad Bunny and Olivia Dean also voiced their concerns during the Grammys. Many wore “ICE Out” pins on the red carpet, demonstrating a united front against what many view as harmful policies.
This pushback from the entertainment community reflects a growing trend where artists feel emboldened to speak out on social justice issues. According to a survey by the Artist Rights Alliance, about 70% of musicians believe they have a responsibility to address social and political issues through their art.
This trend signals a shift in how audiences engage with music and artists. Fans today often expect their favorite celebrities to take a stand on important issues. As Ruffalo and Eilish show, the lines between entertainment and advocacy are blurring.
For continued exploration of celebrities making a difference, check out The Artist Rights Alliance for more insights on the responsibilities artists feel in today’s climate.
Source link
Billie Eilish,Kevin O’Leary,Mark Ruffalo
